Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative Analysis of two Open Source Network Monitoring Systems: Nagios & OpenNMS
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
2010 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

Context: Extensive and rapid continuous growth in Internet Protocol (IP) based networks and as the result of increasing dependencies on these networks makes them extremely challenging to manage and keep them running all the time. 24/7 non-stop monitoring is important to minimize the down time of the network. For this reason dependency on automated network monitoring has been increased. Objectives: There are many tools and systems available for network monitoring. This includes expensive commercial solutions to open source products. Nagios and OpenNMS are two of the most popular systems and they are considered to be close competitors. Comparison discussions about them are very common at different forums on internet. But no empirical study for comparison analysis has been done. In this thesis the comparison study between Nagios and OpenNMS was conducted. Methods: Network monitoring functionalities are listed down from literature followed by industrial interviews with the networking professionals. Then taking these functionalities as a base, to evaluate, survey studies for both systems were conducted separately and comparison analysis of the results was performed. Usability evaluation of both systems was done by conducting usability testing and comparison analysis of the results was performed. Results: Besides providing the comparison of both systems this study also can help to findout the strengths and weaknesses of both systems separately. And in the end we suggested a list of functionalities and features which might help in selection of a monitoring system and also might be helpful for improvement of the monitoring systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , p. 88
Keywords [en]
Network monitoring, Nagios, OpenNMS, NMS, Fault monitoring, Performance monitoring
National Category
Computer Sciences Telecommunications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-3460Local ID: oai:bth.se:arkivex8AACF893F5696FBCC12578320048C16FOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-3460DiVA, id: diva2:830767
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-04-22 Created: 2011-02-09 Last updated: 2018-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3430 kB)4792 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3430 kBChecksum SHA-512
5dbdb9859d33d2ece03afcbf0337728e16b26a0d96fd0629ee2089d110c3f81379f125214e8652eed38061c96078d2a389398ecbf6c5bc8f58922b535a353ace
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Computing
Computer SciencesTelecommunications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5396 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1409 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf