Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Speed Performance Comparison of JavaScript MVC Frameworks
2015 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

ABSTRACT

 

Context: Many websites today are very interactive and the users are getting used to sites that change hundreds of elements every second. Often a JavaScript framework is used to build the web site and with many changing elements on the site the need for a JavaScript framework that can handle the fast changes are needed. Each frameworks do it differently to achieving this but most of them do some manipulation with the Document Object Model (DOM).  

 

Objectives: This research will show how fast the selected MCV like JavaScript frameworks (AngularJs, AngularJs 2.0, Aurelia, Backbone, Ember, Knockout, Mithril, Vue) can create, delete and update HTML elements on the screen.  

 

Methods: This research have used Google Chromes TimeLine tool to measure the speed of the frameworks. The test involves creating a HTML table and fill it with a thousand rows of data with six columns. The tables content are tested to see how fast the frameworks can create, update and remove the elements.    

 

Conclusions: Angular 2.0 almost achieved first place in all tests. Angular 1.5 did very good in the update tests and was good in the create elements test. Backbone and Ember did not do so well in the create and update tests but Backbone was the best framework in one of the delete tests. Aurelia got very good results and so did Vue which almost had the same values as Aurelia throughout the tests. Mithril and Knockout performed well in the create test which placed them in the middle among all the selected frameworks. When it came to the update tests Mithril and Knockout also found them self in the middle positions of all the frameworks. 

 

 

 

 

Key Words: JavaScript, Framework, performance, Angular, Aurelia, Backbone,  Ember, Knockout, Mithril, Vue.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , p. 53
Keywords [en]
JavaScript Framework Angular Aurelia Backbone Ember Knockout Mithril Vue
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-13046OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-13046DiVA, id: diva2:998701
Subject / course
PA1418 Bachelor's Thesis - Large Team Software Engineering Project
Educational program
PAGWE Web Programming
Presentation
2016-09-02, Blekinge Institute of Technology, SE-371 79, KARLSKRONA, 20:50 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-10-06 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2016-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1432 kB)1581 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 1432 kBChecksum SHA-512
7bf3fe2bbe599534b2fb64f94325a1154c4c9095167d6b2ba399519ad5fbada60924169274964066f376f03cc16218a798616d870d96bff2d2337a0af7324a90
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1581 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 4003 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf