Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Defining protocols of systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A survey
Federal University of Technology, BRA.
Federal University of Technology, BRA.
Federal University of Esp'rito Santo, BRA.
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, BRA.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Proceedings - 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2017 / [ed] Felderer, M; Olsson, HH; Skavhaug, A, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2017, s. 202-209, artikkel-id 8051349Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Context: Despite being defined during the first phase of the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) process, the protocol is usually refined when other phases are performed. Several researchers have reported their experiences in applying SLRs in Software Engineering (SE) however, there is still a lack of studies discussing the iterative nature of the protocol definition, especially how it should be perceived by researchers conducting SLRs. Objective: The main goal of this study is to perform a survey aiming to identify: (i) the perception of SE researchers related to protocol definition; (ii) the activities of the review process that typically lead to protocol refinements; and (iii) which protocol items are refined in those activities. Method: A survey was performed with 53 SE researchers. Results: Our results show that: (i) protocol definition and pilot test are the two activities that most lead to further protocol refinements; (ii) data extraction form is the most modified item. Besides that, this study confirmed the iterative nature of the protocol definition. Conclusions: An iterative pilot testcan facilitate refinements in the protocol. © 2017 IEEE.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2017. s. 202-209, artikkel-id 8051349
Emneord [en]
Protocol Definition, Secondary Study, Survey, Systematic Literature Review, Systematic Mapping Study, Application programs, Iterative methods, Surveying, Surveys, Data extraction, Pilot tests, Protocol refinement, Review process, Systematic literature review (SLR), Systematic mapping studies, Software engineering
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-15611DOI: 10.1109/SEAA.2017.17ISI: 000426074600030Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85034417529ISBN: 9781538621400 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-15611DiVA, id: diva2:1163520
Konferanse
43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, (SEAA), Vienna
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-12-07 Laget: 2017-12-07 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-23bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Mendes, Emilia

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Mendes, Emilia
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 57 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf