Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Method for Evaluating Rigor and Industrial Relevance of Technology Evaluations
Ansvarlig organisasjon
2011 (engelsk)Inngår i: Empirical Software Engineering, ISSN 1382-3256 , Vol. 16, nr 3, s. 365-395Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer verlag , 2011. Vol. 16, nr 3, s. 365-395
Emneord [en]
research methodology, empirical, case study, requirements engineering
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-7649DOI: 10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4ISI: 000289254600003Lokal ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfo38811391BE6A519FC125780D0038B5D8OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-7649DiVA, id: diva2:835293
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-09-18 Laget: 2011-01-03 Sist oppdatert: 2018-01-11bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Gorschek, Tony

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Gorschek, Tony

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 131 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf