Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Structuring automotive product lines and feature models: an exploratory study at Opel
Capgemini, DEU.
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik.
Adam Opel AG, DEU.
Fraunhofer Inst Expt Software Engn, DEU.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Requirements Engineering, ISSN 0947-3602, E-ISSN 1432-010X, Vol. 22, s. 105-135Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Automotive systems are highly complex and customized systems containing a vast amount of variability. Feature modeling plays a key role in customization. Empirical evidence through industry application, and in particular methodological guidance of how to structure automotive product lines and their feature models is needed. The overall aim of this work is to provide guidance to practitioners how to structure automotive product lines and their feature models, understanding strengths and weaknesses of alternative structures. The research was conducted in three phases. In the first phase, the context situation was understood using interviews and workshops. In the second phase, possible structures of product lines and feature models were evaluated based on industry feedback collected in workshops. In the third phase, the structures were implemented in the tool GEARS and practitioner feedback was collected. One key challenge was the unavailability of structuring guidelines, which was the focus of this research. The structures considered most suitable for the automotive product line were multiple product lines with modular decomposition. The structures most suitable for the feature model were functional decomposition, using context variability, models corresponding to assets, and feature categories. Other structures have been discarded, and the rationales have been presented. It was possible to support the most suitable structures with the commercial tool GEARS. The implementation in GEARS and the feedback from the practitioners provide early indications for the potential usefulness of the structures and the tool implementation.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer, 2017. Vol. 22, s. 105-135
Emneord [en]
Requirements engineering; Software engineering Automotive; Empirical; Feature modeling; Product line engineering; Variability model
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-10715DOI: 10.1007/s00766-015-0237-zISI: 000394464600005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-10715DiVA, id: diva2:855522
Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-09-21 Laget: 2015-09-21 Sist oppdatert: 2018-01-11bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Petersen, Kai

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Petersen, Kai
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Requirements Engineering

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 196 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf