Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance comparison of the most popular relational and non-relational database management systems
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik.
2018 (Engelska)Självständigt arbete på avancerad nivå (masterexamen), 20 poäng / 30 hpStudentuppsats (Examensarbete)
Abstract [en]

Context. Database is an essential part of any software product. With an emphasis on application performance, database efficiency becomes one of the key factors to analyze in the process of technology selection. With a development of new data models and storage technologies, the necessity for a comparison between relational and non-relational database engines is especially evident in the software engineering domain.

Objectives. This thesis investigates current knowledge on database performance measurement methods, popularity of relational and non-relational database engines, defines characteristics of databases, approximates their average values and compares the performance of two selected database engines.Methods. In this study a number of research methods are used, including literature review, a review of Internet sources, and an experiment. Literature datasets used in the research incorporate over 100 sources including IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library. YCSB Benchmark was used as a direct performance comparison method in an experiment to compare OracleDB’s and MongoDB’s performance.

Results. A list of database performance measurement methods has been defined as a result of the literature review. Two most popular database management engines, one relational and one non-relational has been identified. A set of database characteristics and a database performance comparison methodology has been identified. Performance of two selected database engines has been measured and compared.

Conclusions. Performance comparison between two selected database engines indicated superior results for MongoDB under the experimental conditions. This database proved to be more efficient in terms of average operation latency and throughput for each of the measured workloads. OracleDB however, presented stable results in each of the category leaving the final choice of database to the specifics of a software engineering project. Activities required for the definition of database performance comparison methodology proved to be challenging and require study extension.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2018. , s. 66
Nationell ämneskategori
Programvaruteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-16112OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-16112DiVA, id: diva2:1199667
Ämne / kurs
PA2534 Masterarbete i programvaruteknik
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2018-04-23 Skapad: 2018-04-21 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-04-23Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1038 kB)36270 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT02.pdfFilstorlek 1038 kBChecksumma SHA-512
b0d98d1600c25bedbf92e339469c7a8c88e17e1da48d7cc3fbcf2e0c48a1b0668374fb98409c51eb1dc4d8139d53b4d9ec7b8ce8f408deb630214af06e272ee8
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Av organisationen
Institutionen för programvaruteknik
Programvaruteknik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 36275 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 7533 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf