Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Component selection in Software Engineering: Which attributes are the most important in the decision process?
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik. (SERL Sweden)
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik.
RISE SICS AB, SWE.
RISE SICS AB, SWE.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: EUROMICRO Conference Proceedings, IEEE conference proceedings, 2018, s. 198-205Konferensbidrag, Publicerat paper (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

Abstract— Component-based software engineering is a common approach to develop and evolve contemporary software systems where different component sourcing options are available: 1)Software developed internally (in-house), 2)Software developed outsourced, 3)Commercial of the shelf software, and 4) Open Source Software. However, there is little available research on what attributes of a component are the most important ones when selecting new components. The object of the present study is to investigate what matters the most to industry practitioners during component selection. We conducted a cross-domain anonymous survey with industry practitioners involved in component selection. First, the practitioners selected the most important attributes from a list. Next, they prioritized their selection using the Hundred-Dollar ($100) test. We analyzed the results using Compositional Data Analysis. The descriptive results showed that Cost was clearly considered the most important attribute during the component selection. Other important attributes for the practitioners were: Support of the component, Longevity prediction, and Level of off-the-shelf fit to product. Next an exploratory analysis was conducted based on the practitioners’ inherent characteristics. Nonparametric tests and biplots were used. It seems that smaller organizations and more immature products focus on different attributes than bigger organizations and mature products which focus more on Cost

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
IEEE conference proceedings, 2018. s. 198-205
Serie
EUROMICRO Conference Proceedings, ISSN 1089-6503
Nyckelord [en]
Component - based software engineering; Decision making; Compositional Data Analysis; Cumulative voti
Nationell ämneskategori
Programvaruteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-17057DOI: 10.1109/SEAA.2018.00039ISI: 000450238900030ISBN: 978-1-5386-7383-6 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-17057DiVA, id: diva2:1251725
Konferens
44th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Prague
Forskningsfinansiär
KK-stiftelsen, 20140218Tillgänglig från: 2018-09-27 Skapad: 2018-09-27 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-12-13Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Chatzipetrou, PanagiotaAlégroth, EmilGorschek, TonyWnuk, Krzysztof

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Chatzipetrou, PanagiotaAlégroth, EmilGorschek, TonyWnuk, Krzysztof
Av organisationen
Institutionen för programvaruteknik
Programvaruteknik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 89 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf