Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Lessons from the handling of alternatives in two international bridge projects
Ansvarig organisation
2008 (Engelska)Konferensbidrag, Enbart muntlig presentation (Refereegranskat) PublishedAlternativ titel
Lärdomar från alternativhanteringen i två internationella broprojekt (Svenska)
Abstract [en]

The handling of alternatives in two international projects - the Detroit River International Crossing (Canada-USA) and the Öresund Bridge (Sweden-Denmark) – is compared and analysed. In impact assessment, and in planning, alternatives play an important role. They entail the formulation of different ways to reach a predetermined goal of a project or plan. They can be used to justify the main alternative, or to question the predetermined goals of an endeavour. Large-scale infrastructure projects are often politically and financially sensitive and have significant environmental and societal impacts. It is therefore interesting to investigate the handling of alternatives in these case-studies – in impact assessment and in planning – to analyse the use of alternatives. In the two projects, both of which are fixed links across a body of water and an international boundary, two similar cases in different jurisdictions and systems are analysed. Useful comparisons can be made about why differences in the handling of alternatives occur and lessons can be learnt about what matters and contributes to a “more rational” handling of alternatives in impact assessment; whether it be legislative systems, individual process actors or technical skills.

Abstract [sv]

Alternativhanteringen i två internationalle projekt - Detroit River International Crossing mellan USA och Kanada samt Öresundsbron mellan Sverige och Danmark - analyseras. Jämförelser görs angående skillnader i planerings- och miljöbedömningsprocesserna. Alternativ; miljöbedömning; Öresundsbron; Detroit River International Crossing; planering; transportplanering; alternativhantering; planeringsprocesser

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Perth, Western Australia: IAIA , 2008.
Nyckelord [en]
Alternatives, Öresund bridge, Detroit River International Crossing, planning, transport planning, environmental impact assessment, planning processes
Nationell ämneskategori
Miljöanalys och bygginformationsteknik Samhällsbyggnadsteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-8604Lokalt ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfo9EE5CC02D35D7952C125745200356B54OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-8604DiVA, id: diva2:836342
Konferens
International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) 2008: The Art and Science of Impact Assessment
Anmärkning
Co-authors: Eric Markus, Blekinge Institute of Technology and Kaarina Stiff, Transport Canada. Conference organiser: www.iaia.orgTillgänglig från: 2012-09-18 Skapad: 2008-05-23 Senast uppdaterad: 2015-06-30Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Miljöanalys och bygginformationsteknikSamhällsbyggnadsteknik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 131 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf