Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
QoE based comparison of H.264/AVC and WebM/VP8 in an error-prone wireless network
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för teknik och estetik.
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för teknik och estetik.
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för teknik och estetik.
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Proceedings of the IM 2017 - 2017 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management / [ed] Chemouil P.,Simoes P.,Madeira E.,Secci S.,Monteiro E.,Gaspary L.P.,dos Santos C.R.P.,Charalambides M., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017, s. 1005-1010Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Quality of Experience (QoE) management is a prime topic of research community nowadays as video streaming, online gaming and security applications are completely reliant on the network service quality. Moreover, there are no standard models to map Quality of Service (QoS) into QoE. HTTP media streaming is primarily used for such applications due to its coherence with the Internet and simplified management. The most common video codecs used for video streaming are H.264/AVC and Google's VP8. In this paper, we have analyzed the performance of these two codecs from the perspective of QoE. The most common end-user medium for accessing video content is via home based wireless networks. We have emulated an error-prone wireless network with different scenarios involving packet loss, packet delay and delay variation. The focus of this paper is evaluating the end user satisfaction with the multimedia content by subjective assessment using Mean Opinion Score (MOS). We have observed the overall superiority of H.264/AVC but the VP8 codec strongly gains ground in highly error-prone networks in terms of user satisfaction. © 2017 IFIP.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017. s. 1005-1010
Emneord [en]
H.264/AVC, Multimedia communication, QoE management, Quality of Experience, WebM(VP8), Errors, HTTP, Human computer interaction, Media streaming, Motion Picture Experts Group standards, Multimedia systems, Packet networks, Video signal processing, Video streaming, Wireless networks, Multi-media communications, Qoe managements, Quality of experience (QoE), Quality of service
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-15217DOI: 10.23919/INM.2017.7987426Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85029430735ISBN: 9783901882890 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-15217DiVA, id: diva2:1145539
Konferanse
15th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management, IM 2017, Lisbon
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-09-29 Laget: 2017-09-29 Sist oppdatert: 2017-09-29bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Nawaz, OmerMinhas, Tahir NawazFiedler, Markus

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nawaz, OmerMinhas, Tahir NawazFiedler, Markus
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 107 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf