Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of the FMEA and STPA safety analysis methods: a case study
Lund University, SWE.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-8635-7462
Beer Test Consulting, AUT.
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-3818-4442
Lund University, SWE.
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: Software quality journal, ISSN 0963-9314, E-ISSN 1573-1367, Vol. 27, nr 1, s. 349-387Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

As our society becomes more and more dependent on IT systems, failures of these systems can harm more and more people and organizations. Diligently performing risk and hazard analysis helps to minimize the potential harm of IT system failures on the society and increases the probability of their undisturbed operation. Risk and hazard analysis is an important activity for the development and operation of critical software intensive systems, but the increased complexity and size puts additional requirements on the effectiveness of risk and hazard analysis methods. This paper presents a qualitative comparison of two hazard analysis methods, failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and system theoretic process analysis (STPA), using case study research methodology. Both methods have been applied on the same forward collision avoidance system to compare the effectiveness of the methods and to investigate what are the main differences between them. Furthermore, this study also evaluates the analysis process of both methods by using a qualitative criteria derived from the technology acceptance model (TAM). The results of the FMEA analysis were compared to the results of the STPA analysis, which were presented in a previous study. Both analyses were conducted on the same forward collision avoidance system. The comparison shows that FMEA and STPA deliver similar analysis results.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer, 2019. Vol. 27, nr 1, s. 349-387
Nyckelord [en]
Hazard analysis, Safety analysis, Critical systems, Failure mode and effect analysis, System theoretic process analysis
Nationell ämneskategori
Programvaruteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-15664DOI: 10.1007/s11219-017-9396-0ISI: 000462236000010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-15664DiVA, id: diva2:1166953
Anmärkning

open access

Tillgänglig från: 2017-12-17 Skapad: 2017-12-17 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-04-18Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1452 kB)474 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 1452 kBChecksumma SHA-512
41c1a4c428d8a5969a022bc0b5cafbf49807f949d76992935af79f80facba91f40acd059c8320dd862aa86aa3a386073afae6c273b31f63e1ff2b5790c2f90f4
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltexthttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11219-017-9396-0

Personposter BETA

Felderer, Michael

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Sulaman, Sardar MuhammadFelderer, Michael
Av organisationen
Institutionen för programvaruteknik
I samma tidskrift
Software quality journal
Programvaruteknik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 474 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 383 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf