Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An anatomy of requirements engineering in software startups using multi-vocal literature and case survey
Oulun Yliopisto, M3S Research Group, FIN.
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1987-2234
Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul, BRA.
Oulun Yliopisto, M3S Research Group, FIN.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Systems and Software, ISSN 0164-1212, E-ISSN 1873-1228, Vol. 146, s. 130-151Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Context: Software startups aim to develop innovative products, grow rapidly, and thus become important in the development of economy and jobs. Requirements engineering (RE) is a key process area in software development, but its effects on software startups are unclear. Objective: The main objective of this study was to explore how RE (elicitation, documentation, prioritization and validation) is used in software startups. Method: A multi-vocal literature review (MLR) was used to find scientific and gray literature. In addition, a case survey was employed to gather empirical data to reach this study's objective. Results: In the MLR, 36 primary articles were selected out of 28,643 articles. In the case survey, 80 respondents provided information about software startup cases across the globe. Data analysis revealed that during RE processes, internal sources (e.g., for source), analyses of similar products (e.g., elicitation), uses of informal notes (e.g., for documentation), values to customers, products and stakeholders (e.g., for prioritization) and internal reviews/prototypes (e.g., for validation) were the most used techniques. Conclusion: After an analysis of primary literature, it was concluded that research on this topic is still in early stages and more systematic research is needed. Furthermore, few topics were suggested for future research. © 2018 Elsevier Inc.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier Inc. , 2018. Vol. 146, s. 130-151
Emneord [en]
Case survey, Multi-vocal literature review, Requirements engineering, Software startups, Software design, Case surveys, Empirical data, Innovative product, Internal source, Key process areas, Literature reviews, Prioritization, Systematic research, Surveys
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-17083DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.059ISI: 000451488900010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85053782208OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-17083DiVA, id: diva2:1253595
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-10-05 Laget: 2018-10-05 Sist oppdatert: 2021-05-24bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Klotins, EriksUnterkalmsteiner, MichaelGorschek, Tony

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Klotins, EriksUnterkalmsteiner, MichaelGorschek, Tony
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Systems and Software

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 337 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf