Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
CERSE - Catalog for empirical research in software engineering: A Systematic mapping study
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik.
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik.
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för datalogi och datorsystemteknik. Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, Institutionen för programvaruteknik.
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Information and Software Technology, ISSN 0950-5849, E-ISSN 1873-6025, Vol. 105, s. 117-149Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Context Empirical research in software engineering contributes towards developing scientific knowledge in this field, which in turn is relevant to inform decision-making in industry. A number of empirical studies have been carried out to date in software engineering, and the need for guidelines for conducting and evaluating such research has been stressed. Objective: The main goal of this mapping study is to identify and summarize the body of knowledge on research guidelines, assessment instruments and knowledge organization systems on how to conduct and evaluate empirical research in software engineering. Method: A systematic mapping study employing manual search and snowballing techniques was carried out to identify the suitable papers. To build up the catalog, we extracted and categorized information provided by the identified papers. Results: The mapping study comprises a list of 341 methodological papers, classified according to research methods, research phases covered, and type of instrument provided. Later, we derived a brief explanatory review of the instruments provided for each of the research methods. Conclusion: We provide: an aggregated body of knowledge on the state of the art relating to guidelines, assessment instruments and knowledge organization systems for carrying out empirical software engineering research; an exemplary usage scenario that can be used to guide those carrying out such studies is also provided. Finally, we discuss the catalog's implications for research practice and the needs for further research. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier B.V. , 2019. Vol. 105, s. 117-149
Emneord [en]
Empirical methods, Empirical research, Mapping study, Decision making, Mapping, Software engineering, Assessment instruments, Empirical method, Empirical research in software engineering, Empirical Software Engineering, Knowledge organization systems, Mapping studies, Systematic mapping studies, Knowledge management
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-17108DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2018.08.008ISI: 000452586900008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85054061108OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-17108DiVA, id: diva2:1255151
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-10-11 Laget: 2018-10-11 Sist oppdatert: 2019-04-24bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Views of Research Quality in Empirical Software Engineering
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Views of Research Quality in Empirical Software Engineering
2019 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Background. Software Engineering (SE) research, like other applied disciplines, intends to provide trustful evidence to practice. To ensure trustful evidence, a rigorous research process based on sound research methodologies is required. Further, to be practically relevant, researchers rely on identifying original research problems that are of interest to industry; and the research must fulfill various quality standards that form the basis for the evaluation of the empirical research in SE. A dialogue and shared view of quality standards for research practice is still to be achieved within the research community.

 Objectives. The main objective of this thesis is to foster dialogue and capture different views of SE researchers on method level (e.g., through the identification and reasoning on the importance of quality characteristics for experiments, surveys and case studies) as well as general quality standards for Empirical Software Engineering (ESE). Given the views of research quality, a second objective is to understand how to operationalize, i.e. build and validate instruments to assess research quality. 

Method. The thesis makes use of a mixed method approach of both qualitative and quantitative nature. The research methods used were case studies, surveys, and focus groups. A range of data collection methods has been employed, such as literature review, questionnaires, and semi-structured workshops. To analyze the data, we utilized content and thematic analysis, descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results. We draw two distinct views of research quality. Through a top-down approach, we assessed and evolved a conceptual model of research quality within the ESE research community. Through a bottom-up approach, we built a checklist instrument for assessing survey-based research grounded on supporting literature and evaluated ours and others’ checklists in research practice and research education contexts.

Conclusion. The quality standards we identified and operationalized support and extend the current understanding of research quality for SE research. This is a preliminary, but still vital, step towards a shared understanding and view of research quality for ESE research. Further steps are needed to gain a shared understanding of research quality within the community. 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Karlskrona: Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, 2019
Serie
Blekinge Institute of Technology Doctoral Dissertation Series, ISSN 1653-2090 ; 7
Emneord
Research Quality, Quality Standards, Empirical Software Engineering, Research Methodology
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:bth-17648 (URN)978-91-7295-372-7 (ISBN)
Disputas
2019-06-14, J1650, Campus Gräsvik, Karlskrona, 13:00 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-03-05 Laget: 2019-02-27 Sist oppdatert: 2019-05-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Molléri, Jefferson SeidePetersen, KaiMendes, Emilia

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Molléri, Jefferson SeidePetersen, KaiMendes, Emilia
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Information and Software Technology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 255 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf