Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An Empirical Study on the Use of CDIO in Software Engineering Education
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2300-068X
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8132-0107
2022 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Education, ISSN 0018-9359, E-ISSN 1557-9638, Vol. 65, no 4, p. 684-694Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Contribution: In this study, we accumulated the knowledge and generated evidence on how and in what context CDIO framework has been used in software engineering (SE) education. The aggregated evidence will enable SE academics in making informed decisions while adopting CDIO for SE education and build upon it. Background: CDIO framework is relevant for SE as it focuses on enabling engineering graduates in conceiving, designing, implementing, and operating complex systems and products. We were not able to find any study that identifies and aggregates the evidence on the use of CDIO for SE education. Research Questions: This study attempts to answer the following research questions: 1) how CDIO has been used in SE education? and 2) what are the experiences of academics in applying the CDIO framework in SE education? Methodology: Using a mixed-method approach (systematic mapping study and interview study with experienced academics in SE), we established the state of the art and practice on the use of CDIO in SE education. Findings: Getting a commitment from the higher management, teachers, and students is a major challenge in the adoption of the CDIO initiative followed by a lack of competence, finance, and resources. Ownership, motivation, persistence, and training of teachers and students are required not only to adopt CDIO for SE but also to sustain it.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2022. Vol. 65, no 4, p. 684-694
Keywords [en]
Education, Interviews, Standards, Systematics, Software engineering, Databases, Software, CDIO, empirical study, software engineering (SE) education, systematic mapping study (SMS)
National Category
Software Engineering Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-22875DOI: 10.1109/TE.2022.3163911ISI: 000782821200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85128276341OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-22875DiVA, id: diva2:1654644
Part of project
OSIR- Open Source Inspired Reuse, Knowledge FoundationSERT- Software Engineering ReThought, Knowledge Foundation
Funder
Knowledge Foundation, 20190081Knowledge Foundation, 20180010Available from: 2022-04-28 Created: 2022-04-28 Last updated: 2022-11-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tanveer, BinishUsman, Muhammad

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tanveer, BinishUsman, Muhammad
By organisation
Department of Software Engineering
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Education
Software EngineeringPedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 94 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf