Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Equality in cumulative voting: A systematic review with an improvement proposal
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Sektionen för datavetenskap och kommunikation.
2013 (Engelska)Ingår i: Information and Software Technology, ISSN 0950-5849, E-ISSN 1873-6025, Vol. 55, nr 2, s. 267-287Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Context: Prioritization is an essential part of requirements engineering, software release planning and many other software engineering disciplines. Cumulative Voting (CV) is known as a relatively simple method for prioritizing requirements on a ratio scale. Historically, CV has been applied in decision-making in government elections, corporate governance, and forestry. However, CV prioritization results are of a special type of data-compositional data. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to aid decision-making by collecting knowledge on the empirical use of CV and develop a method for detecting prioritization items with equal priority. Methods: We present a systematic literature review of CV and CV analysis methods. The review is based on searching electronic databases and snowball sampling of the found primary studies. Relevant studies are selected based on titles, abstracts, and full text inspection. Additionally, we propose Equality of Cumulative Votes (ECVs)-a CV result analysis method that identifies prioritization items with equal priority. Results: CV has been used in not only requirements prioritization and release planning but also in e.g. software process improvement, change impact analysis and model driven software development. The review presents a collection of state of the practice studies and CV result analysis methods. In the end, ECV was applied to 27 prioritization cases from 14 studies and identified nine groups of equal items in three studies. Conclusions: We believe that the analysis of the collected studies and the CV result analysis methods can help in the adoption of CV prioritization method. The evaluation of ECV indicates that it is able to detect prioritization items with equal priority and thus provide the practitioner with a more fine-grained analysis.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier , 2013. Vol. 55, nr 2, s. 267-287
Nyckelord [en]
Compositional data, Cumulative voting, Log-ratio, Prioritization, Requirements engineering
Nationell ämneskategori
Programvaruteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-6815DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.08.004ISI: 000312759500007Lokalt ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfo7181DE29F6010B78C1257AC6004EF2A8OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-6815DiVA, id: diva2:834362
Tillgänglig från: 2013-12-17 Skapad: 2012-11-30 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-11Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Torkar, Richard

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Torkar, Richard
Av organisationen
Sektionen för datavetenskap och kommunikation
I samma tidskrift
Information and Software Technology
Programvaruteknik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 56 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf