Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance Evaluation of Gluster and Compuverde Storage Systems: Comparative analysis
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Communication Systems.
2016 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Context. Big Data and Cloud Computing nowadays require large amounts of storage that are accessible by many servers. To overcome the performance bottlenecks and single point of failure distributed storage systems came into force. So, our main aim in this thesis is evaluating the performance of these storage systems. A file coding technique is used that is the erasure coding which will help in data protection for the storage systems.

Objectives. In this study, we investigate the performance evaluation of distributed storage system and understand the effect on performance for various patterns of I/O operations that is the read and write and also different measurement approaches for storage performance.

Methods. The method is to use synthetic workload generator by streaming and transcoding video data as well as benchmark tool which generates the workload like SPECsfs2014 is used to evaluate the performance of distributed storage systems of GlusterFS and Compuverde which are file based storage.

Results. In terms of throughput results, Gluster and Compuverde perform similar for both NFS and SMB server.

The average latency results for both NFS and SMB shares indicate that Compuverde has lower latency.

When comparing results of both Compuverde and Gluster, Compuverde delivers 100% IOPS with NFS server and Gluster delivers relatively near to the requested OP rate and with SMB server Gluster delivers 100% IOPS and Compuverde delivers more than the requested OP rate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
Keyword [en]
Distributed storage, Erasure coding, Performance, Streaming
National Category
Telecommunications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-13595OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-13595DiVA: diva2:1055647
Subject / course
ET2580 Master's Thesis (120 credits) in Electrical Engineering with emphasis on Telecommunication Systems
Educational program
ETATX Master of Science Programme in Electrical Engineering with emphasis on Telecommunication Systems
Presentation
2016-09-27, J3423 Aristoteles, Bleking Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, 14:45 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-12-23 Created: 2016-12-13 Last updated: 2016-12-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1410 kB)243 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1410 kBChecksum SHA-512
4a834a00dbae71b0c6d9e606447671e27c9e8a13f09471fc1e6c02fcc33e3579f9f0634378c66531c0ee30a171e6c31afe6cf6746372db8cf783d920e37bdbc9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Communication Systems
Telecommunications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 243 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1218 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf