Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The performance of 'temperature stick' carbon dioxide absorbent monitors in diving rebreathers
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.
University of Auckland, NZL.
Université Laval Québec, CAN.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, ISSN 1833-3516, Vol. 49, no 1, p. 48-56Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: Diving rebreathers use canisters containing soda lime to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from expired gas. Soda lime has a finite ability to absorb CO₂. Temperature sticks monitor the exothermic reaction between CO₂ and soda lime to predict remaining absorptive capacity. The accuracy of these predictions was investigated in two rebreathers that utilise temperature sticks. METHODS: Inspiration and rEvo rebreathers filled with new soda lime were immersed in water at 19°C and operated on mechanical circuits whose ventilation and CO₂-addition parameters simulated dives involving either moderate exercise (6 MET) throughout (mod-ex), or 90 minutes of 6 MET exercise followed by 2 MET exercise (low-ex) until breakthrough (inspired PCO₂ [PiCO₂] = 1 kPa). Simulated dives were conducted at surface pressure (sea-level) (low-ex: Inspiration, n = 5; rEvo, n = 5; mod-ex: Inspiration, n = 7, rEvo, n = 5) and at 3-6 metres' sea water (msw) depth (mod-ex protocol only: Inspiration, n = 8; rEvo, n = 5). RESULTS: Operated at surface pressure, both rebreathers warned appropriately in four of five low-ex tests but failed to do so in the 12 mod-ex tests. At 3-6 msw depth, warnings preceded breakthrough in 11 of 13 mod-ex tests. The rEvo warned conservatively in all five tests (approximately 60 minutes prior). Inspiration warnings immediately preceded breakthrough in six of eight tests, but were marginally late in one test and 13 minutes late in another. CONCLUSION: When operated at even shallow depth, temperature sticks provided timely warning of significant CO₂ breakthrough in the scenarios examined. They are much less accurate during simulated exercise at surface pressure. Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
NLM (Medline) , 2019. Vol. 49, no 1, p. 48-56
Keywords [en]
Equipment, Hypercapnia, Monitoring, Soda lime, Technical diving
National Category
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-17764DOI: 10.28920/dhm49.1.48-56ISI: 000463069300008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85062856026OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-17764DiVA, id: diva2:1302458
Available from: 2019-04-04 Created: 2019-04-04 Last updated: 2019-04-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Silvanius, Mårten

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Silvanius, MårtenFrånberg, Oskar
By organisation
Department of Mechanical Engineering
In the same journal
Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf