Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
Wageningen University and Research Centre, NLD.
University of Tartu, EST.
Universidade do Minho, PRT.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3818-4442
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, ISSN 1382-3256, E-ISSN 1573-7616Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Research collaboration between industry and academia supports improvement and innovation in industry and helps ensure the industrial relevance of academic research. However, many researchers and practitioners in the community believe that the level of joint industry-academia collaboration (IAC) projects in Software Engineering (SE) research is relatively low, creating a barrier between research and practice. The goal of the empirical study reported in this paper is to explore and characterize the state of IAC with respect to industrial needs, developed solutions, impacts of the projects and also a set of challenges, patterns and anti-patterns identified by a recent Systematic Literature Review (SLR) study. To address the above goal, we conducted an opinion survey among researchers and practitioners with respect to their experience in IAC. Our dataset includes 101 data points from IAC projects conducted in 21 different countries. Our findings include: (1) the most popular topics of the IAC projects, in the dataset, are: software testing, quality, process, and project managements; (2) over 90% of IAC projects result in at least one publication; (3) almost 50% of IACs are initiated by industry, busting the myth that industry tends to avoid IACs; and (4) 61% of the IAC projects report having a positive impact on their industrial context, while 31% report no noticeable impacts or were “not sure”. To improve this situation, we present evidence-based recommendations to increase the success of IAC projects, such as the importance of testing pilot solutions before using them in industry. This study aims to contribute to the body of evidence in the area of IAC, and benefit researchers and practitioners. Using the data and evidence presented in this paper, they can conduct more successful IAC projects in SE by being aware of the challenges and how to overcome them, by applying best practices (patterns), and by preventing anti-patterns. © 2019, The Author(s).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer New York LLC , 2019.
Keywords [en]
Anti-patterns, Best practices, Challenges, Empirical study, Evidence, Industry-academia collaborations, Patterns, Software engineering, Industrial research, Software testing, Statistical tests, Empirical studies, Project management
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-17897DOI: 10.1007/s10664-019-09711-yScopus ID: 2-s2.0-85064827278OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-17897DiVA, id: diva2:1316781
Available from: 2019-05-21 Created: 2019-05-21 Last updated: 2019-05-21

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3115 kB)13 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3115 kBChecksum SHA-512
85a5d39cff36d72246c6cfac31ac1218b41da33d9c14ea0e770c91d134a8b115dd8acc3522adbf51214f583a209c02dc805f45f6e3f32a5ac9f64aa124df43ed
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Felderer, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Felderer, Michael
By organisation
Department of Software Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Empirical Software Engineering
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 13 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf