Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Influence of Gender and Viewing Frequency on Quality of Experience
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Technology and Aesthetics.ORCID iD: 0009-0004-2874-0403
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Technology and Aesthetics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8929-4911
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NOR.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Technology and Aesthetics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4327-117x
2020 (English)In: 12th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2020, IEEE, 2020, article id 9123106Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Some of the most important aspects for content creators and service providers are the content appeal and the time consumed by the end users on a particular application or service. Gender and age can influence the Quality of Experience (QoE) ratings of multimedia based on the nature of the shown content, yet few studies have quantized this notion. In this paper, we zoom in on the influence of gender on user ratings in a video QoE study (N=89) with packet loss as the main system influence factor. We have analyzed the impact of gender on QoE subjective ratings both as a standalone influence factor and in coherence of temporal traits like the frequency of watching online content. We have observed significant trends to highlight the importance of systematically checking and reporting on the impact of basic human factors, such as gender in relation to quality perception with respect to different types of content. © 2020 IEEE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2020. article id 9123106
Series
International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), ISSN 2372-7179, E-ISSN 2472-7814
Keywords [en]
Human Factors, Machine Learning, QoE, User Diversity, Multimedia systems, Content creators, End users, On-line contents, Quality of experience (QoE), Quality perceptions, Service provider, Subjective rating, User rating, Quality of service
National Category
Computer Sciences Telecommunications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-20275DOI: 10.1109/QoMEX48832.2020.9123106ISI: 000619223500033Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85087721388ISBN: 9781728159652 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-20275DiVA, id: diva2:1457378
Conference
12th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2020, Athlone, Ireland, 26 May 2020 through 28 May 2020
Available from: 2020-08-11 Created: 2020-08-11 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. A Holistic View of QoE for Multimedia Streaming
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A Holistic View of QoE for Multimedia Streaming
2023 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Internet access has evolved in the last decade with the availability of smart handheld devices and high bandwidth offered by mobile networks at reduced costs. Multimedia traffic primarily video became the main share of global Internet traffic due to the popularity of multimedia supported social applications, online gaming, and IPTV. Thus, the success of any network based business model is dependent on service quality and Quality of Experience (QoE) is widely accepted as a means to describe user satisfaction with a service. QoE can be influenced by numerous factors ranging from content liking to system and context-related artifacts.

In this thesis, a holistic approach is adopted to evaluate the QoE of an end-user regarding video quality based on system, contextual and human factors. At the system level, an impact of the Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU), and the comparison of widely used video codecs in error-prone networks is investigated by using diverse streaming protocols on an emulated network. It is found that the myth of using small MTU for better performance in high-loss scenarios comes at a cost of increased latency at the intermediate nodes and doesn’t provide any gain in video quality. The performance of the Google royalty-free VP8 codec was also shown to be on par with the widely adopted and proprietary H.264, especially in scenarios involving high jitter. At a human level, user delight towards the shown stimulus, his or her mood along with the frequency of watching online content (contextual), and their impact on quality ratings are investigated. It is found that human-related personality traits tend to influence subjective ratings and highlight the requirement of more cohesive QoE models to estimate user perception.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlshamn: Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, 2023. p. 120
Series
Blekinge Institute of Technology Licentiate Dissertation Series, ISSN 1650-2140 ; 4
Keywords
QoE metrics; Video quality assessments; AVC performance; mobile codecs efficiency; QoE IFs
National Category
Communication Systems
Research subject
Telecommunication Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:bth-24393 (URN)978-91-7295-454-0 (ISBN)
Presentation
2023-05-15, Ateljén, Campus Karlshamn, Karlshamn, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2023-03-30 Created: 2023-03-27 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Nawaz, OmerFiedler, MarkusKhatibi, Siamak

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nawaz, OmerFiedler, MarkusKhatibi, Siamak
By organisation
Department of Technology and Aesthetics
Computer SciencesTelecommunications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 130 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf