Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Top managers’ formal and informal control practices in product innovation processes
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Industrial Economics. Hitotsubashi University, JPN.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Industrial Economics. Kristianstad University, SWE.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7228-3263
2020 (English)In: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management/Emerald, ISSN 1176-6093, E-ISSN 1758-7654, Vol. 17, no 4, p. 497-524Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: This study aims to understand the formal and informal practices of top managers as they seek to control product innovation processes and how the style of control used differs during development stages and gates. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative in-depth case study was conducted at a multinational corporation (pseudonym: MEC). The authors examined 12 product innovation projects and carried out semi-structured interviews to understand the experiences, perceptions and challenges of the people involved in product development projects with a focus on the interactions between top managers and the project teams. Findings: The authors found that MEC uses formal control mechanisms such as a stage-gate model and a project management and reporting system to keep track of the progress of innovation projects. In addition, top managers use informal controls through involvement in innovation activities and interaction with the team members during the stages and gates of the development process. To carry out their control practices top managers use four distinct styles of control as follows: participative, facilitative, empowering and authoritative. Practical implications: Suggestions are provided for managers on how formal and informal management control tools can be used in innovation processes. The authors show how top managers can broaden their range of interventions by involving themselves in product innovation projects in different ways. Originality/value: This paper shows how the combination of formal and informal controls can generate a more holistic view of management control in innovation. It also adds to previous conceptualizations of control use by suggesting four distinct styles, which top managers can use to involve themselves in product innovation processes. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. , 2020. Vol. 17, no 4, p. 497-524
Keywords [en]
Formal control, Informal control, Innovation process, Management control, Top manager involvement, Use of control
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-20300DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-02-2019-0042ISI: 000558247400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85089037191OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-20300DiVA, id: diva2:1458517
Available from: 2020-08-17 Created: 2020-08-17 Last updated: 2021-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pan Fagerlin, Wen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pan Fagerlin, WenLövstål, Eva
By organisation
Department of Industrial Economics
In the same journal
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management/Emerald
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 174 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf