Pain and analgesics in patients with hard-to-heal ulcers: Using telemedicine or standard consultationsShow others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Wound Care, ISSN 0969-0700, E-ISSN 2052-2916, Vol. 30, no 6, p. S23-S32Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Objective: To compare consultations carried out via video with those performed in person for patients with painful, hard-to-heal ulcers, with a focus on ulcer pain and pain treatment. A further aim was to investigate predictors for pain and pain treatment. Method: This was a register-based, quasi-experimental study based on data from the Swedish Registry of Ulcer Treatment (RUT). A total of 100 patients with hard-to-heal ulcers diagnosed via video consultation were compared with 1888 patients diagnosed in person with regard to pain assessment, intensity and treatment. Ulcer pain intensity was assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Normally distributed variables (age, VAS) were compared between consultation groups using Student's t-test. Non-normally distributed variables (ulcer size, ulcer duration) were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test, except for healing time, which was analysed with a log-rank test. Categorical variables (gender, ulcer aetiology and prescribed analgesics) were compared using Pearson's chi-square test (c2). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Predictors for pain and pain treatment were analysed in multiple regression analyses. Results: The results showed a high presence of pain; 71% of patients with pain reported severe ulcer pain. There was no significant difference in ability to assess pain by VAS in the group diagnosed via video consultation (90%) compared with the group diagnosed in person (86%) (c2, p=0.233). A significantly higher amount of prescribed analgesics was found for patients diagnosed via video (84%) compared with patients diagnosed by in-person assessment (68%) (c2, p=0.044). Predictors for high-intensity pain were female gender or ulcers due to inflammatory vessel disease, while the predictors for receiving analgesics were older age, longer healing time and being diagnosed via video consultation. Conclusion: To identify, assess and treat ulcer pain is equally possible via video as by in-person consultation. The results of this study confirm that patients with hard-to-heal ulcers suffer from high-intensity ulcer pain, with a discrepancy between pain and pain relief. Further well-designed randomised controlled studies are necessary to understand how best to deploy telemedicine in ulcer pain treatment. Declaration of interest: This study was partly funded by the Scientific Committee of Blekinge County Council´s Research and Development Foundation. The authors have no conflicts of interest. © 2021 MA Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MA Healthcare Ltd , 2021. Vol. 30, no 6, p. S23-S32
Keywords [en]
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Referral and Consultation, Sweden, Telemedicine, Treatment Outcome, Ulcer, Young Adult, analgesic agent, anticonvulsive agent, antidepressant agent, antiulcer agent, nonsteroid antiinflammatory agent, opiate, paracetamol, topical agent, analgesia, anticonvulsant therapy, Article, clinical assessment, comparative study, controlled study, human, major clinical study, neuropathy, ointment, pain assessment, pain intensity, prescription, primary health care, quasi experimental study, register, skin ulcer, teleconsultation, total quality management, ulcer healing, videorecording, visual analog scale, patient referral, very elderly, EHealth, Leg ulcer pain, National registries
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-22970DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup6.S23ISI: 000662222000004PubMedID: 34120467Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85108243350OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-22970DiVA, id: diva2:1660265
2022-05-232022-05-232022-08-09Bibliographically approved