Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Automating and increasing efficiency of component documentation maintenance: A case study
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.
2022 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Context. Maintaining good software documentation quality is an important aspect of software maintenance. To decrease associated costs, interest in automating documentation tasks has recently increased. However, there is a lack of guidance regarding how practitioners may apply related research findings to pre-existing documentation.

Objectives. In this case study we investigate what the most important documentation properties for manually produced component documentation quality are and how these can be linked to issues in real-world documentation. We also examine to what extent they can be tackled based on current tools and approaches.

Methods. A literature study is employed to identify previously reported documentation properties and related automation strategies. These are then mapped against issues identified in the documentation of a telecommunications company department. Finally, strategies for maintaining documentation quality are proposed and the applicability of these is retrospectively evaluated.

Results. Current deeply automated strategies are found to be largely ineffective for the analyzed documentation issues specifically and for improving documentation content not tightly linked to source code in general. Manually produced automated tests and version control as well as raw documentation formatting enabling these are identified as more promising approaches for improving documentation maintenance.

Propositions for diminishing department documentation issues. Four suggestions are made on how documentation issues could be tackled. Particular attention is given to making code samples testable.

Conclusions and Future Work. Manual documentation is still often needed, and writing it in a way that enables automation where possible will become increasingly important. Containerization technology is widely used but there is a dearth of corresponding testing knowledge and tooling. Problems with code samples in documentation commonly cause critical issues. Improving methods for maintaining code-related sections of documentation, especially containerization-related code samples, is an urgent challenge.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. , p. 28
Keywords [en]
case study, component documentation, automated tests, infrastructure as code
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-23117OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-23117DiVA, id: diva2:1668947
External cooperation
Ericsson
Subject / course
PA1445 Kandidatkurs i Programvaruteknik
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2022-06-17 Created: 2022-06-13 Last updated: 2022-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1201 kB)235 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1201 kBChecksum SHA-512
489104cccba454a321b8f0b0b689af788f0c793b4840e42cbc0ffbbac53c499a256b682c1c366388ea8e4eff34a1fdd6dc918b1eff8d0d3bec05a87ef3ff0be3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Software Engineering
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 235 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 267 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf