Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Credit Card Approval Prediction: A comparative analysis between logistic regressionclassifier, random forest classifier, support vectorclassifier with ensemble bagging classifier.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Computer Science.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Computer Science.
2023 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Background. Due to an increasing number of credit card defaulters, companies arenow taking greater precautions when approving credit applications. When a customermeets certain requirements, credit card firms typically use their experience todecide whether to grant them a credit card. Additionally, a few machine learningmethods have been applied to support the final decision.

Objectives. The aim of this thesis is to compare the accuracy of logistic regressionclassifier, random forest classifier, and support vector classifier with the ensemblebagging classifier for predicting credit card approval.

Methods. This thesis follows a method called general experimentation to determinethe most accurate classification technique for predicting credit card approval. Thedataset is taken from Kaggle, which contains information about credit card applications.The selected algorithms are trained with training data and validate themusing validation data then evaluate their performance on the testing data by usingmetrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and ROC curve. Now ensemblelearning bagging technique is applied to combine the predictions of these multiplemodels using majority voting to create an ensemble model. Finally, the performanceof the ensemble model was evaluated on the testing data and compared its accuracyto that of the individual models to identify the most accurate classification techniquefor predicting credit card approval.

Results. Among the four selected machine learning algorithms, the random forestclassifier performed better with an accuracy of 88.41% on the testing dataset.The second-best algorithm is the ensemble bagging classifier, with an accuracy of84.78%. Hence, the random forest classifier is the most accurate algorithm for predictingcredit card approval.

Conclusions. After evaluating various classifiers, including logistic regression classifier,random forest classifier, support vector classifier, and ensemble bagging, it wasobserved that the random forest classifier outperformed the other models in termsof predicting accuracy. This indicates that the random forest classifier was better atpredicting credit card approval.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. , p. 60
Keywords [en]
Machine Learning, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Ensemble Learning Bagging.
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-25198OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-25198DiVA, id: diva2:1784289
Subject / course
DV1478 Bachelor Thesis in Computer Science
Educational program
DVGDT Bachelor Qualification Plan in Computer Science 60.0 hp
Presentation
2023-05-22, J1640, Valhallavägen 1, 371 41, Karlskrona, 10:15 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2023-08-15 Created: 2023-07-26 Last updated: 2023-08-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Credit Card Approval Prediction: A comparative analysis between logistic regressionclassifier, random forest classifier, support vectorclassifier with ensemble bagging classifier.(972 kB)1472 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 972 kBChecksum SHA-512
229c496850b46ca6b49812e3b3fda21878587a15faf68abf6e3b4e82010ad1fa89450815405880224d2fa5325afcb06161f4eef409b677b27b32fe9128fb8832
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Computer Science
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1472 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 729 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf