Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Requirements quality research: a harmonized theory, evaluation, and roadmap
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3995-6125
University of Hamburg, Germany.
Netlight Consulting GmbH, Germany.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0619-6027
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Requirements Engineering, ISSN 0947-3602, E-ISSN 1432-010X, Vol. 28, no 4, p. 507-520Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

High-quality requirements minimize the risk of propagating defects to later stages of the software development life cycle. Achieving a sufficient level of quality is a major goal of requirements engineering. This requires a clear definition and understanding of requirements quality. Though recent publications make an effort at disentangling the complex concept of quality, the requirements quality research community lacks identity and clear structure which guides advances and puts new findings into an holistic perspective. In this research commentary, we contribute (1) a harmonized requirements quality theory organizing its core concepts, (2) an evaluation of the current state of requirements quality research, and (3) a research roadmap to guide advancements in the field. We show that requirements quality research focuses on normative rules and mostly fails to connect requirements quality to its impact on subsequent software development activities, impeding the relevance of the research. Adherence to the proposed requirements quality theory and following the outlined roadmap will be a step toward amending this gap. © 2023, The Author(s).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2023. Vol. 28, no 4, p. 507-520
Keywords [en]
Requirements quality, Survey, Theory, Life cycle, Software design, High quality, Late stage, Quality requirements, Quality theory, Requirement engineering, Requirement quality, Research communities, Roadmap, Software development life-cycle, Quality control
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-25327DOI: 10.1007/s00766-023-00405-yISI: 001046952900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85167790788OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-25327DiVA, id: diva2:1791501
Part of project
SERT- Software Engineering ReThought, Knowledge Foundation
Funder
Knowledge Foundation, 20180010Available from: 2023-08-25 Created: 2023-08-25 Last updated: 2023-12-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1461 kB)102 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1461 kBChecksum SHA-512
0e00d63c8860d6d413c681bd8af36065b0fa2b7315387f74a20de3b49c79bacfbbced9647f8021d4a2bc24514fafb457522048546ee1696158984b9fcf84abd0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Frattini, JulianMendez, DanielFucci, DavideUnterkalmsteiner, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Frattini, JulianMendez, DanielFucci, DavideUnterkalmsteiner, Michael
By organisation
Department of Software Engineering
In the same journal
Requirements Engineering
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 108 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 292 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf