Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The efficacy of reconstructive therapy in the surgical management of peri-implantitis: A 3-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0992-2362
University of Corsica, France.
Private Practice, Hanau, Germany.
2024 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, ISSN 0303-6979, E-ISSN 1600-051X, Vol. 51, no 10, p. 1267-1276Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim: To assess whether guided bone regeneration (GBR) treatment of peri-implantitis-related bony defects could improve healing compared to open flap debridement (OFD) at 36 months. Materials and Methods: In a multi-centre, randomized clinical trial, 32 individuals received OFD (control group [CG]) and 34 GBR treatment (test group [TG]). Radiographic defect fill (RDF), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) suppuration (SUP), mucosal recession (MREC) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated at 36 months. Results: Fifty individuals attended a supportive peri-implant therapy program and completed the 36-month follow-up. GBR treatment resulted in an RDF of 2.13 ± 1.26 mm compared to 1.64 ± 1.54 mm following OFD (p =.18). No difference was found in PPD, BOP, SUP, REC or PROs between the groups. Successful treatment (no additional bone loss, PPD ≤ 5 mm, no BOP and no SUP) was achieved in 46.2% in TG and 20% in CG (p =.053). Treatment results obtained at 12 months were generally maintained up to 36 months. No significant changes were noticed between 12 and 36 months. Conclusions: At 36 months, treatment results obtained at 1 year were sustained following both GBR and OFD in patients attending supportive peri-implant therapy. GBR resulted in more RDF and higher composite treatment success rate than OFD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier [NCT02375750]). © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2024. Vol. 51, no 10, p. 1267-1276
Keywords [en]
bone augmentation, bone substitute, native bilayer collagen membrane, peri-implantitis, surgical treatment
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-26777DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.14049ISI: 001270317000001PubMedID: 39020503Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85198733221OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-26777DiVA, id: diva2:1887708
Available from: 2024-08-09 Created: 2024-08-09 Last updated: 2024-11-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3269 kB)93 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3269 kBChecksum SHA-512
07627f3fde402c1bea243c06b05ba8b3dafc169a313ca2a2718ae90c9343bc9463548680fc41b198b791074ca59c12fdf9ca2cf9f9d6684b9a7402ad9b1906dd
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Renvert, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Renvert, Stefan
By organisation
Department of Health
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 95 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 268 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf