Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dispute resolution mechanisms in “business to business relations” in Armenia
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Management.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Management.
2008 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

The problem related to ADR functioning in Armenia has a crucial importance for further economic development. The institutional development in Armenia has formed a peculiar reality of “institutional consistency” in this field, an essential element of which is a fragile dividing line between formal and informal institutions. Business reality shows that in Armenia the usage of ADR in “business to business” relations is widespread. The matter is that mostly it takes a form of informal relations, and actually formal ADR institutions have become “unclaimed”. This fact creates serious obstacles for the Government which seeks to establish effectively functioning formal ADR institutions. Unless the reasons as to why informal ADR mechanism is in high demand are identified, it is obvious that it will not be possible to elaborate a feasibly justified policy in this field. The aim of the study is to have a general overview on the dispute resolution mechanisms in Armenia and to study opportunities for their efficient implementation. Particularly the study is focusing on the following questions 1. What is the theoretical background of contract enforcement 2. What are the theoretical costs of contract enforcement to businesses? 3. How disputes in B2B are being solved in Armenia? 4. What are the real costs the businesses face during dispute resolution 5. How the costs of dispute resolution stipulate selection between different resolution mechanisms

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. , p. 96
Keywords [en]
contract, enforcement, business to business, dispute, resolution
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-1242Local ID: oai:bth.se:arkivexA7921724510C17EEC12574E3001D0F70OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-1242DiVA, id: diva2:828405
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-05-22 Created: 2008-10-15 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(546 kB)133 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 546 kBChecksum SHA-512
c521a65f7dc8066b4a502a8fe80128380dd103bcbdbf3d395a6235f31f6b95c9d55bcd6b3bf12350d79433a00c0245eadd2159332421efc6897d4fd6b52f8773
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Management
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 133 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 121 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf