Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Software Process Improvement Measurement and Evaluation Framework (SPI-MEF)
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
2009 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

During the last decades, the dependency on software has increased. Many of today’s modern devices embed software to control their functions. The increasing dependency has also taken part in shaping the software development process to produce better quality software. Many researchers and practitioners have spent large investments to improve the software development process. A research area within software engineering that addresses the assessment and improvement issues in development processes is called Software Process Improvement (SPI). One of the essential aspects in software process improvement is measuring the outcome of the implemented changes. The measurement and evaluation of software process improvement provides the means for the organization to articulate the achievement level of their goals. Although the importance of measuring and evaluating the outcome of software process improvement is paramount, there exist no common guidelines or systematic methods of measuring and evaluating the improvement. This condition evokes difficulties for practitioners to implement software process improvement measurement programs. This issue has raised the challenge to develop and implement an effective framework for measuring and evaluating the outcome of software process improvement initiatives. This thesis presents a measurement and evaluation framework for software process improvement. SPI-MEF provides guidelines in the form of systematic steps to evaluate the outcome of software process improvement. The framework is based on key concepts which were elaborated in previous work. In this thesis, a validation of SPI-MEF is also conducted by involving representatives from academia and industry. The validation is aimed to judge the frameworks’ usability, applicability and usefulness. Finally, a refinement of the framework is carried out based on the input from the validation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , p. 176
Keywords [en]
Software process improvement, Measurement and evaluation framework, Outcome of software process improvement, Concepts in measuring and evaluating software process improvement
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-2493Local ID: oai:bth.se:arkivex9934E8C4FB2B310EC125763C002C954AOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-2493DiVA, id: diva2:829772
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-04-22 Created: 2009-09-25 Last updated: 2018-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(7659 kB)4806 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 7659 kBChecksum SHA-512
9fc051804cb522554f20917591ed1fff00ba8104ce7c3c891b4c7c833558c2f82f74afb55e89f76d6e4cf94d15da3b83c70b0c6bcc831ab520c3378492ae8f39
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Unterkalmsteiner, Michael
By organisation
School of Computing
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4809 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 274 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf