Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Verification and Validation of Object Oriented Software Design: Guidelines on how to Choose the Best Method
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Department of Systems and Software Engineering.
2004 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year))Student thesisAlternative title
Verifiering och Validering av Objekt-Orienterad Mjukvarudesign : Guidelines hur man väljer rätt method (Swedish)
Abstract [en]

The earlier in the development process a fault is found, the cheaper it is to correct the fault. Therefore are verification and validation methods important tools. The problem with this is that there are many methods to choose between. This thesis sheds light on how to choose between four common verification and validation methods. The verification and validation methods presented in this thesis are reviews, inspections and Fault Tree Analysis. Review and inspection methods are evaluated in an empirical study. The result of the study shows that there are differences in terms of defect detection. Based on this study and literature study, guidelines on how to choose the best method in a given context are given.

Abstract [sv]

Desto tidigare i utvecklingsprocessen som ett fel hittas, desto billigare är det att rätt till detta fel. Därför är verifierings- och valideringsmetoder viktiga verktyg. Problemet är att det finns många metoder. Den här rapporten sprider ljus över hur man ska välja mellan fyra vanliga verifierings- och valideringsmetoder. Verifierings- och valideringsmetoderna i den här rapporten är granskningar, inspektioner och "Fault Tree Analysis". Granskningar och inspektioner är utvärderade i en empiriskt studie. Resultatet av studien visar att det finns skillnader mellan metoderna när det gäller att hitta fel.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. , p. 50
Keywords [en]
Review, inspection, experiment, Verification and Validation, Unified Modeling Language
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-2590Local ID: oai:bth.se:arkivexFB3519077A903F76C1256EB0003F8508OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-2590DiVA, id: diva2:829875
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-04-22 Created: 2004-06-11 Last updated: 2018-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1418 kB)660 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1418 kBChecksum SHA-512
474b10b0350d7baee31616e8edbcf4d9ddeb79ea426b8da216272ba4f2f0dc3e2cce25534760f2b531b489ffbc884357389477524119af62a147699026d12f19
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Systems and Software Engineering
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 662 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 134 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf