Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Zigbee versus Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Department of Telecommunication Systems.
2008 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years))Student thesisAlternative title
Zigbee kontra Radio Frekvens Identifiering (Swedish)
Abstract [en]

The growth of Telecommunication in the world has brought about the need for regular update, research and findings, to meet the demands of the global world. With the rising demand of home automation and sensor network, the ZigBee protocol has been identified to target on low power devices, Personal Area Network (PAN) and sensor nodes. Wireless wearable systems crave room for new user interface components. This fosters the ease of mobility and availability of devices, in order to accomplish things when necessary. Since the technology of the global world is fast changing, it therefore brings about a very high level of competition and challenges among developers, programmers, systems engineers, telecommunication engineers and a host of others. When people fail to measure up to the present day demand, their design and market structure tends to drop. Wireless systems are gradually phasing out wired systems due to the ease of operation and usage. Also, with the existence of wireless systems, there tend to be the need to invest as little as possible and then having an operation that can be maximally effective and reliable. This research work talks about the ZigBee versus RFID technology and how they are correlated. Zigbee is solely targeted at Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) applications, requiring a low data and battery life and also a secure network. At a technical level, it is more reliable, supports larger networks and is more fully featured. However, a very good comparison is made between ZigBee and RFID. The choice therefore of a company, individual or organization is determined by their utmost priorities in line with some factors like performance output, implementation cost, security, usability and profit marginalization.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. , 38 p.
Keyword [en]
ZigBee, RFID, Telecommunication, WPAN and Wireless Systems
National Category
Telecommunications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-3736Local ID: oai:bth.se:arkivex6733C5203E64F2FDC1257515006BCE1BOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-3736DiVA: diva2:831048
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Note
Direct all questions/enquiries to solenzo@engineer.com, solonos2001@yahoo.com, +46762238785Available from: 2015-04-22 Created: 2008-12-04 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(370 kB)71 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 370 kBChecksum SHA-512
4c855f51753cb8df9912f392fe450b7b3a1bf595b97b74b15ccf95ff6ade5980bbc7bda34f2bdef54114089205ff3d30aa58a81c9a2c8cf4cfce926134bfee55
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Telecommunication Systems
Telecommunications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 71 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 256 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf