Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs)
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Department of Telecommunication Systems.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Department of Telecommunication Systems.
2008 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

The IETF MANET working group mandate was to standardise IP routing protocols in MANETs. The RFC 2501 specifies the charter for the working group. The RFCs still has unanswered questions concerning either implementation or deployment of the protocols. Nevertheless, the working group identifies the proposed algorithms as a trial technology. Aggressive research in this area has continued since then, with prominent studies on routing protocols such as AODV, DSR, TORA and OLSR. Several studies have been done on the performance evaluation of routing protocols using different evaluation methods. Different methods and simulation environments give different results and consequently, there is need to broaden the spectrum to account for effects not taken into consideration in a particular environment. In this project, we evaluate the performance of AODV, OLSR, DSR and TORA ad hoc routing protocols in OPNET. We simulate a Mobile ad hoc network with all nodes in the network receiving FTP traffic from a common source (FTP server). In this way, the results of this analysis would also represent a situation where the MANET receives traffic from another network via a common gateway. In addition, the mobile nodes were randomly placed in the network to provide the possibility of multihop routes from a node to the server. The performance of these routing protocols is evaluated with respect to routing overhead, throughput, end-to-end delay and packet delivery ratio. In this study, results show that OLSR floods the network with the highest amount of routing traffic followed by TORA, AODV and DSR. All the protocols exhibit a low packet delivery ratio of maximum 59%. This degradation is expected due to huge retransmissions in the network because of using TCP traffic. OLSR outperforms AODV, DSR and TORA in terms of end-to-end delay and throughput. Varying traffic volumes or speeds in the network, leaves OLSR superior in terms of end-to-end delay and throughput. OLSR build and maintains consistent paths resulting in low delay. The results in this study also confirm TORA’s inability to handle rapid increases in traffic volumes. TORA performs well in networks where the volume of traffic increases gradually.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. , 62 p.
Keyword [en]
MANET, AODV, OLSR, DSR, TORA, Ad hoc, Routing Overhead, Packet Delivery Ratio, Packet End-to-End Delay and Throughput
National Category
Telecommunications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-3876Local ID: oai:bth.se:arkivex247E26E7F470CF9FC1257543005B1BFCOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-3876DiVA: diva2:831190
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Note
Jason Mwanza jasonchilenga@gmail.com +260955222220 Bained Nyirenda nyirendab@gmail.com +260955770014Available from: 2015-04-22 Created: 2009-01-19 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1080 kB)393 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1080 kBChecksum SHA-512
0ce3d03ad2a833759096506776005a406cd8dde81beb703fb1fee574e59ff5286ce1811eb311fd64ac553420c598a3c936851fc5d2cf548b042e20d523608820
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Telecommunication Systems
Telecommunications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 393 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 173 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf