Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring the Accuracy of Existing Effort Estimation Methods for Distributed Software Projects-Two Case Studies
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
2009 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years))Student thesisAlternative title
Exploring adekvata befintliga Ansträngningszoner beräkningsmetoder för distribuerad programvara Projekt-två fallstudier (Swedish)
Abstract [en]

The term “Globalization” brought many challenges with itself in the field of software development. The challenge of accurate effort estimation in GSD is one among them. When talking about effort estimation, the discussion starts for effort estimation methods. There are a number of effort estimation methods available. Existing effort estimation methods used for co-located projects are might not enough capable to estimate effort for distributed projects. This is why; ratio of failure of GSD projects is high. It is important to calibrate existing methods or invent new with respect to GSD environment. This thesis is an attempt to explore the accuracy of effort estimation methods for distributed projects. For this purpose, the authors selected three estimation approaches: COCOMO II, SLIM and ISBSG. COCOMO II and SLIM are two well known effort estimation methods, whereas, ISBSG is used to check the trend of a project depending upon its (ISBSG’s) repository. The selection of the methods and approaches was based on their popularity and advantages over other methods/approaches. Two finished projects from two different organizations were selected and analyzed as case studies. The results indicated that effort estimation with COCOMO II deviated 15.97 % for project A and 9.71% for project B. Whereas, SLIM showed the deviation of 4.17% for project A and 10.86 % for project B. Thus, the authors concluded that both methods underestimated the effort in the studied cases. Furthermore, factors that might cause deviation are discussed and several solutions are recommended. Particularly, the authors state that existing effort estimation methods can be used for GSD projects but they need calibration by considering GSD factors to achieve accurate results. This calibration will help in process improvement of effort estimation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , 46 p.
Keyword [en]
Effort Estimation, Global Software Development (GSD), COCOMO II, SLIM, ISBSG
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-4126Local ID: oai:bth.se:arkivex5CC35D7886D2614AC125760E004254B4OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-4126DiVA: diva2:831449
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-04-22 Created: 2009-08-10 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1022 kB)295 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1022 kBChecksum SHA-512
5d5bb356517edb0c41e9e13ad761cce2fab89610727c72b9d671254c2a504e0881bc1600adfe0191e6dd38bfae213e0be0ae811ad1769b2c35c240a822c5ef95
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Computing
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 295 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf