Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A systematic literature review on the industrial use of software process simulation
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.
2014 (English)In: Journal of Systems and Software, ISSN 0164-1212, Vol. 97Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context Software process simulation modelling (SPSM) captures the dynamic behaviour and uncertainty in the software process. Existing literature has conflicting claims about its practical usefulness: SPSM is useful and has an industrial impact; SPSM is useful and has no industrial impact yet; SPSM is not useful and has little potential for industry. Objective To assess the conflicting standpoints on the usefulness of SPSM. Method A systematic literature review was performed to identify, assess and aggregate empirical evidence on the usefulness of SPSM. Results In the primary studies, to date, the persistent trend is that of proof-of-concept applications of software process simulation for various purposes (e.g. estimation, training, process improvement, etc.). They score poorly on the stated quality criteria. Also only a few studies report some initial evaluation of the simulation models for the intended purposes. Conclusion There is a lack of conclusive evidence to substantiate the claimed usefulness of SPSM for any of the intended purposes. A few studies that report the cost of applying simulation do not support the claim that it is an inexpensive method. Furthermore, there is a paramount need for improvement in conducting and reporting simulation studies with an emphasis on evaluation against the intended purpose.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2014. Vol. 97
Keyword [en]
software process simulation, systematic literature review
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-6459DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.059ISI: 000343352500004Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfo918BA1E6885171A3C1257D9D00544072OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-6459DiVA: diva2:833967
Available from: 2015-01-02 Created: 2014-11-27 Last updated: 2017-03-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(274 kB)210 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 274 kBChecksum SHA-512
a67bcaf7637d8e6f755b642424659ee4bb28f4997c8d05a175b15d51a702bcd4ef0c6e9e54169b04ec0122fb6de3849573258ed00ca9e6b259f03cfe26278fe0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
bin Ali, NaumanPetersen, KaiWohlin, Claes
By organisation
Department of Software Engineering
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 210 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 183 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf