Writing for Synthesis of Evidence in Empirical Software Engineering
2014 (English)Conference paper (Refereed) Published
Context: Systematic literature reviews have become common in software engineering in the last decade, but challenges remain. Goal: Given the challenges, the objective is to describe improvement areas in writing primary studies, and hence provide a good basis for researchers aiming at synthesizing research evidence in a specific area. Method: The results presented are based on a literature review with respect to synthesis of research results in software engineering with a particular focus on empirical software engineering. The literature review is complemented and exemplified with experiences from conducting systematic literature reviews and working with research methodologies in empirical software engineering. Results: The paper presents three areas where improvements are needed to become more successful in synthesizing empirical evidence. These three areas are: terminology, paper content and reviewing. Conclusion: It is concluded that it must be possible to improve the primary studies, but it requires that researchers start having synthesis in mind when writing their research papers.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Torino, Italy: ACM , 2014.
Systematic literature reviews, research synthesis, systematic mapping studies, research methodology, guidelines, evidence
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:bth-6473DOI: 10.1145/2652524.2652559Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfo1AB4549AF472A6E2C1257DAF007BA1D8ISBN: 978-1-4503-2774-9OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-6473DiVA: diva2:833986
International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)
Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement Article No. 462014-12-172014-12-152015-06-30Bibliographically approved