Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Worldviews, Research Methods, and their Relationship to Validity in Empirical Software Engineering Research
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
2013 (English)Conference paper, (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Abstract—Background - Validity threats should be considered and consistently reported to judge the value of an empirical software engineering research study. The relevance of specific threats for a particular research study depends on the worldview or philosophical worldview of the researchers of the study. Problem/Gap - In software engineering, different categorizations exist, which leads to inconsistent reporting and consideration of threats. Contribution - In this paper, we relate different worldviews to software engineering research methods, identify generic categories for validity threats, and provide a categorization of validity threats with respect to their relevance for different world views. Thereafter, we provide a checklist aiding researchers in identifying relevant threats. Method - Different threat categorizations and threats have been identified in literature, and are reflected on in relation to software engineering research. Results - Software engineering is dominated by the pragmatist worldviews, and therefore use multiple methods in research. Maxwell’s categorization of validity threats has been chosen as very suitable for reporting validity threats in software engineering research. Conclusion - We recommend to follow a checklist approach, and reporting first the philosophical worldview of the researcher when doing the research, the research methods and all threats relevant, including open, reduced, and mitigated threats.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Ankara, Turkey: IEEE , 2013.
Keyword [en]
Empirical Software Engineering, Validity
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-6645DOI: 10.1109/IWSM-Mensura.2013.22ISI: 000330579700012Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfo9760C0033F8EC5A6C1257BC6002ED78CISBN: 978-0-7695-5078-7 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-6645DiVA: diva2:834169
Conference
The Joint Conference of the 23nd International Workshop on Software Measurement (IWSM) and the 8th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (Mensura)
Available from: 2014-07-17 Created: 2013-08-13 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(213 kB)191 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 213 kBChecksum SHA-512
8c3b02ffd7353908a46e9c2ab6a82e73b12fa3a773af32fba95af6ebbd79f264d690b5a2880763a37e580cf5d20025acf22dade54595b0441e91a08a763b3993
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Petersen, Kai
By organisation
School of Computing
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 191 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf