Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Decision Support Framework for Metric Selection in Goal-Based Measurement Programs: GQM-DSFMS
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1532-8223
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
2013 (English)In: Journal of Systems and Software, ISSN 0164-1212, Vol. 86, no 12, p. 3091-3108Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Software organizations face challenges in managing and sustaining their measurement programs over time. The complexity of measurement programs increase with exploding number of goals and metrics to collect. At the same time, organizations usually have limited budget and resources for metrics collection. It has been recognized for quite a while that there is the need for prioritizing goals, which then ought to drive the selection of metrics. On the other hand, the dynamic nature of the organizations requires measurement programs to adapt to the changes in the stakeholders, their goals, information needs and priorities. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to use structured approaches that provide transparency, traceability and guidance in choosing an optimum set of metrics that would address the highest priority information needs considering limited resources. This paper proposes a decision support framework for metrics selection (DSFMS) which is built upon the widely used Goal Question Metric (GQM) approach. The core of the framework includes an iterative goal-based metrics selection process incorporating decision making mechanisms in metrics selection, a pre-defined Attributes/Metrics Repository, and a Traceability Model among GQM elements. We also discuss alternative prioritization and optimization techniques for organizations to tailor the framework according to their needs. The evaluation of the GQM-DSFMS framework was done through a case study in a CMMI Level 3 software company.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2013. Vol. 86, no 12, p. 3091-3108
Keywords [en]
Software measurement program, Goal based measurement, Goal Question Metric, GQM, Decision support, Optimization, Prioritization
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-6770DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.022ISI: 000328523300010Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfo643ECF494DF1BAAAC1257BC6002CE3B4OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-6770DiVA, id: diva2:834311
Available from: 2014-03-07 Created: 2013-08-13 Last updated: 2021-06-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1653 kB)1292 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1653 kBChecksum SHA-512
390e01aa06c3e415ab480c1ed2b932a4a4a99f77993ccad35d3f33c9d26b457b1ab41cfd0c01113ee4bf4461665b6a29f7f8ea079f157598ec276f1050d897f1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Gencel, CigdemPetersen, KaiIqbal, Muhammad Imran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gencel, CigdemPetersen, KaiIqbal, Muhammad Imran
By organisation
School of Computing
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1292 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 397 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf