Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Identifying Strategies for Study Selection in Systematic Reviews and Maps
Responsible organisation
2011 (English)Conference paper, (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Study selection in systematic reviews is prone to bias and there exist no commonly defined strategies of how to reduce the bias and resolve disagreement between researchers. This study aims at identifying strategies for bias reduction and disagreement resolution. A review of existing systematic reviews is conducted for study selection strategy identification. In total 13 different strategies have been identified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Banff, Canada, 2011.
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-7333DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2011.46Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoBE2BF2B08C29E091C125797F006A8238OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-7333DiVA: diva2:834940
Conference
Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2012-01-08 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Petersen, Kai
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf