Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dynamic Modeling of a Boring Bar Using Theoretical and Experimental Engineering Methods Part 1: Distributed-Parameter System Modeling and Experimental Modal Analysis
Responsible organisation
2009 (English)In: International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, ISSN 1027-5851, Vol. 14, no 3, 124-133 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Boring bar vibration is a common problem during internal turning operations and is a major problem for the manufacturing industry. High levels of boring bar vibration generally occur at frequencies related to the first two fundamental bending modes of a boring bar. This is the first of two companion papers that summarize the theoretical and experimental work carried out concerning modeling of dynamic properties of boring bars. This paper introduces the Timoshenko beam theory for the modeling of clamped boring bars. Also, the traditional Euler-Bernoulli beam theory is applied. These continuous system methods have been utilized to produce fixed-free beam models of the clamped boring bar. In order to improve accuracy of dynamic models of clamped boring bars, the modeling of the boring bar clamping is addressed by means of multi-span beam models with pinned boundary conditions. The derived boring bar models have also been compared with results obtained by means of experimental modal analysis, conducted on the actual boring bar clamped in a lathe. The multi-span beam boring bar models display higher correlation with experimental modal analysis results as compared to fixed-free beam models. For the fixed-free beams the Timoshenko model results in the highest correlation with the experimental results. On the other hand, the interval in frequency and the orientation of the two fundamental modes demonstrate differences, particularly between the continuous system models and the experimental results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration , 2009. Vol. 14, no 3, 124-133 p.
National Category
Signal Processing Applied Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-7953Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoCEB9A163B2C11A21C1257631004592B6OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-7953DiVA: diva2:835634
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2009-09-14 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Håkansson, Lars
In the same journal
International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration
Signal ProcessingApplied Mechanics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf