Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An exploratory study of clinical decision-making in five countries
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Health, Science and Mathematics.
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2001 (English)In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, ISSN 1527-6546, E-ISSN 1547-5069, Vol. 33, no 1, 83-90 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To identify the cognitive processes nurses use in their decision-making in long- and short-term care settings in five countries, and the demographic variables associated with their decision-making. Method and Samples: The instrument used was a 56-item questionnaire that has been shown to be reliable in earlier studies. The sample consisted of five convenience samples of registered nurses working in either geriatric wards (n = 236) or acute medical-surgical wards (n = 223) in hospitals or nursing homes in Canada, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. Findings: Five models of decision-making were identified on the basis of factor analysis. They represent both analytical and intuitive cognitive processes. Analytical cognitive processes were emphasized in information collection, problem definition, and planning of care, and intuitive cognitive processes were emphasized in planning, implementing, and evaluating care. Professional education, practical experience, field of practice, and type of Knowledge were significantly associated with decision-making models as well as with country of residence of the participants, The highest proportion of analytically oriented decisionmakers was found among nurses in long-term care, the decision-making of nurses in shortterm cave was more intuitively oriented. Conclusions: The results indicate that decision-making of participants varied from country to country and in different nursing situations. Future research should be focused on reasons for these differences, the relationship between the task and the nurses' type of knowledge, and how nurses use their knowledge to make decisions in different nursing situations. (C) 2001 SIGMA THETA TAU INTERNATIONAL.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
INDIANAPOLIS: SIGMA THETA TAU INT , 2001. Vol. 33, no 1, 83-90 p.
Keyword [en]
clinical decision-making, nursing, survey, international
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-8212ISI: 000168878000022Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoC51308C9C403DC2DC12575B00020BC11OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-8212DiVA: diva2:835901
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2009-05-08 Last updated: 2016-09-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekman, Sirkka-Liisa
By organisation
Department of Health, Science and Mathematics
In the same journal
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 51 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf