Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparison between Fast Factorized Backprojection and frequency-domain algorithms in UWB low frequency SAR
Responsible organisation
2008 (English)Conference paper, (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Two frequency-domain algorithms Chirp Scaling (CS) with the advantage of simplification and Range Migration (RM) with the advantage of accuracy are candidates for a comparative study to the time-domain algorithm Fast Factorized Backprojection (FFBP) with reference to a UWB system are presented in this paper. The comparison is based on UWB SAR image quality measurements such as spatial resolution, Integrated Sidelobe Ratio (ISLR), Peak Sidelobe Ratio (PSLR) and processing time connected to computational cost. The simulated SAR data, which is used in this study, is based on the parameters of the airborne UWB low frequency CARABAS-II system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Boston: IEEE , 2008.
Keyword [en]
Comparison, FFBP, RM, CS, UWB, SAR
National Category
Signal Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-8414Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoB4ADC8CB71D6BD67C12574AB0032A000OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-8414DiVA: diva2:836138
Conference
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2008-08-20 Last updated: 2016-05-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vu, Viet ThuyPettersson, Mats
Signal Processing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf