Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparisons and Evaluation of ITU-R Recomendation P.1546 Versions
Responsible organisation
2006 (English)Conference paper, (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper, the validity of P.1546, in short range (typically less than 20km) terrestrial environment is analysed by comparing its three versions (P.1546, P.1546-1, and P.1546-2) against simple models and against measurement results obtained by utilising the pilot signal of a commercial CDMA mobile network in rural Australia. The results show that the latest version on average underestimates the field strength by more than 10 dB for typical Australian rural areas, however it improves the error standard deviation. The causes of these effects and the suggestions for further development of the Recommendation are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Melbourne, Australia: IEEE , 2006.
National Category
Telecommunications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-9075Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoCD8BFFF20928CD55C1257333002638D7OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-9075DiVA: diva2:836851
Conference
IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2007-08-10 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zepernick, Hans-Jürgen
Telecommunications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf