Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for Sustainable Product Development and Procurement
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7382-1825
Responsible organisation
2005 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 14, no 15-16, 1420-1430 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Trade-off situations often occur in the product development and procurement processes when alternative solutions emphasize different aspects that have to be balanced against each other. Ecodesign tools can be used in both product development and purchasing, for example to prescribe design alternatives, assess environmental impacts or to compare environmental improvement alternatives. However, it is not always clear what should be chosen in trade-off situations. In this study, fifteen different Ecodesign tools were analyzed to ascertain whether a valuation is included in the tools, in what way the tools give support in different types of trade-off situations and whether the tools give support from a sustainability perspective. Nine of the fifteen tools analyzed included a valuation and were able to give support in a trade-off situation, but the support was not sufficient. The valuation should include a lifecycle perspective and a framework for sustainability. Otherwise it can lead to strategically incorrect decisions from a sustainability perspective with concomitant risks of sub-optimized investment paths and blind alleys. However, all the analyzed tools can be complemented with other tools and methods based on strategic planning towards sustainability in order to include a framework for sustainability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsiever , 2005. Vol. 14, no 15-16, 1420-1430 p.
Keyword [en]
Ecodesign tools, trade-off, product development, purchasing, procurement, sustainability, sustainable development
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Applied Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-9337ISI: 000240298500014Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoFEE11B695CD0EE99C12570830045BA3DOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-9337DiVA: diva2:837149
Note

Journal of Cleaner Production. In press (2005).

Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2005-09-21 Last updated: 2016-09-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Byggeth, Sophie
By organisation
Department of Mechanical Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Social Sciences InterdisciplinaryApplied Mechanics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 148 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf