System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Experimental Investigations of Different Microphone Installations for Active Noise Control in Ducts
Responsible organisation
2006 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A request on ventilation systems today is the feature of a low noise level. A common method to attenuate ventilation noise is to use passive silencers. However, such silencers are not suitable for the lowest frequencies and one solution is to use active noise control (ANC) to increase the noise attenuation in the low frequency range. Normally when using a feedforward ANC system to attenuate duct noise, both the reference microphone and the error microphone are exposed to airflow. As the airflow excites the diaphragm of the microphones, the microphone signals become contaminated by uncorrelated pressure fluctuations that are not part of the sound propagating in the duct. By reducing the flow velocity around the microphones, these uncorrelated pressure fluctuations can be reduced and the noise reduction improved. One way to reduce the flow velocity around the microphones is to place the microphones in outer microphone boxes connected to the duct via a small slit. In this paper a new practical design for the reduction of flow velocity around the microphones is presented; the microphone installation is based on a T-duct, and therefore it makes maintenance and especially construction easier, compared to the microphone box with a slit. Furthermore, comparative results concerning the performance of an ANC system for the two different microphone installations, the T-duct configurations and the microphone boxes with varying slit width, are presented. The results show that the active noise control performance is almost equal when using the suggested microphone installation as compared to when using a microphone box with a slit.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Vienna, Austria: International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration , 2006.
Keywords [en]
active noise control, ventilation systems, duct, microphone windscreen, microphone installation
National Category
Signal Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-9410Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoEB150030C9CFF23CC125719900634AC6OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-9410DiVA, id: diva2:837248
Conference
Thirteenth International Congress on Sound and Vibration
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2006-06-26 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(328 kB)320 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 328 kBChecksum SHA-512
1b5d9cbd749886a64634b015da097d5ff1931c70bf9fb0c3fbd56f4c6ec465749113b8a3088a3d5abec315000c639c4ffd4d8da79b9ede2664803747763404f7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Johansson, SvenHåkansson, LarsClaesson, Ingvar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, SvenHåkansson, LarsClaesson, Ingvar
Signal Processing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 320 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 241 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf