Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Simple Is Better?: An Experiment on Requirements Prioritisation
Responsible organisation
2003 (English)Conference paper, (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The process of selecting the right set of requirements for a product release is highly dependent on how well we succeed in prioritising the requirements candidates. There are different techniques available for requirements prioritisation, some more elaborate than others. In order to compare different techniques, a controlled experiment was conducted with the objective of understanding differences regarding time consumption, ease of use, and accuracy. The requirements prioritisation techniques compared in the experiment are the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a variation of the Planning Game (PG), isolated from Extreme Programming. The subjects were 15 Ph.D. students and one professor, who prioritised mobile phone features using both methods. It was found that the straightforward and intuitive PG was less time consuming, and considered by the subjects as easier to use, and more accurate than AHP.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lund, Sweden, 2003.
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-9622Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoB7EE5CD5EFEBA79BC1256E2900567CFFOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-9622DiVA: diva2:837518
Conference
Third Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practise in Sweden (SERPS '03)
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2004-01-28 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wohlin, Claes
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf