Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An experience-based framework for evaluating alignment of software quality goals
Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Informat, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece..
Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Informat, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece..
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.
2015 (English)In: Software quality journal, ISSN 0963-9314, E-ISSN 1573-1367, Vol. 23, no 4, 567-594 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Efficient quality management of software projects requires knowledge of how various groups of stakeholders involved in software development prioritize the product and project goals. Agreements or disagreements among members of a team may originate from inherent groupings, depending on various professional or other characteristics. These agreements are not easily detected by conventional practices (discussions, meetings, etc.) since the natural language expressions are often obscuring, subjective, and prone to misunderstandings. It is therefore essential to have objective tools that can measure the alignment among the members of a team; especially critical for the software development is the degree of alignment with respect to the prioritization goals of the software product. The paper proposes an experience-based framework of statistical and graphical techniques for the systematic study of prioritization alignment, such as hierarchical cluster analysis, analysis of cluster composition, correlation analysis, and closest agreement-directed graph. This framework can provide a thorough and global picture of a team's prioritization perspective and can potentially aid managerial decisions regarding team composition and leadership. The framework is applied and illustrated in a study related to global software development where 65 individuals in different roles, geographic locations and professional relationships with a company, prioritize 24 goals from individual perception of the actual situation and for an ideal situation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2015. Vol. 23, no 4, 567-594 p.
Keyword [en]
Software, Quality, Global software development, Cluster analysis, Alignment, Different perspectives
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-11001DOI: 10.1007/s11219-014-9251-5ISI: 000363257000002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-11001DiVA: diva2:873498
Available from: 2015-11-24 Created: 2015-11-24 Last updated: 2016-09-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Barney, SebastianWohlin, Claes
By organisation
Department of Software Engineering
In the same journal
Software quality journal
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 131 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf