Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Essentials of Teamcare in Randomized Controlled Trials of Multidisciplinary or Interdisciplinary Interventions in Somatic Care: A Systematic Review
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Health.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Open Journal of Nursing, ISSN 2162-5336, E-ISSN 2162-5344, ISSN 2162-5344, Vol. 12, no 5, 1089-1101 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Teamcare should, like all patient care, also contribute to evidence-based practice (EBP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on teamcare have been performed but no study has addressed its essentials. How far this EBP has progressed in different health aspects is generally established in systematic reviews of RCTs. Aim: The aim is to determine the essentials of teamcare including the nurse profession in RCTs of multi- or interdisciplinary interventions in somatic care focusing on the stated context, goals, strategies, content as well as effectiveness of quality of care. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to Cochrane review assumptions to identify, appraise and synthesize all empirical evidence meeting pre-specified eligibility criteria. The PRISMA statement guided the data selection process of 27 articles from PubMed and CINAHL. Results: Eighty-five percent of RCTs in somatic care showed a positive effectiveness of teamcare interventions, of which interdisciplinary ones showed a greater effectiveness compared with the multidisciplinary approach (100% vs 76%). Also theory-based RCTs presented higher positive effectiveness (85%) compared with non-theory-based RCTs (79%). The RCTs with positive effectiveness showed greater levels for professional-centered ambition in terms of goals and for team-directed initiatives in terms of strategy, and a significantly higher level for patient-team interaction plans in terms of content was shown. Conclusions: Teamcare RCTs are still grounded in the multidisciplinary approach having a professional-centered ambition while interdisciplinary approaches especially those that are theory-based appear to be essential with regard to positive effectiveness and preferable when person-centered careis applied.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 12, no 5, 1089-1101 p.
Keyword [en]
Teamcare, Randomized Controlled Trial, Somatic Care, Systematic Review
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-11652DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2015.512116OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-11652DiVA: diva2:906350
Available from: 2016-02-24 Created: 2016-02-24 Last updated: 2017-03-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(457 kB)100 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 457 kBChecksum SHA-512
ae9fcade0793a8b012fac94e4ddca72f4a30a05c330541dcd0c799ef7b77d14885ff504dbbc679c55cd169528ec8a769ad375563e3cce81dcb038667cc1b84ce
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Ewa K.Lindberg, Catharina
By organisation
Department of Health
In the same journal
Open Journal of Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 100 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 134 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf