Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Horizontal and vertical targeting: a population-based comparison of public eldercare services in urban and rural areas of Sweden
Stockholm Gerontol Res Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden..
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Health.
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol, Aging Res Ctr, Care Sci & Soc, Solna, Sweden.;Stockholm Univ, Solna, Sweden..
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Health.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, ISSN 1594-0667, E-ISSN 1720-8319, Vol. 28, no 1, 147-158 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

The concepts of target efficiency can be used to assess the extent to which service provision is in line with the needs of the population. Horizontal target efficiency denotes the extent to which those deemed to need a service receive it and vertical target efficiency is the corresponding extent to which those who receive services actually need them. The aim of this study was to assess the target efficiency of the Swedish eldercare system and to establish whether target efficiencies differ in different geographical areas such as large urban, midsize urban and rural areas. Vertical efficiency was measured by studying those people who received eldercare services and was expressed as a percentage of those who received services who were functionally dependent. To measure horizontal target efficiency, data collected at baseline in the longitudinal population study SNAC (Swedish National study on Aging and Care) during the years 2001-2004 were used. The horizontal efficiency was calculated as the percentage of functionally dependent persons who received services. Functional dependency was measured as having difficulty with instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and/or personal activities of daily living (PADL). Services included long-term municipal eldercare services (LTC). Horizontal target efficiency for the public LTC system was reasonably high in all three geographical areas, when using dependency in PADL as the measure of need (70-90 %), but efficiency was lower when the less restrictive measure of IADL dependency was used (40-50 %). In both cases, the target efficiency was markedly higher in the large urban and the rural areas than in the midsize urban areas. Vertical target efficiency showed the same pattern-it was almost 100 % in all areas for IADL dependency, but only 50-60 % for PADL dependency. Household composition differed in the areas studied as did the way public long-term care was provided to people living alone as compared to those co-habiting.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016. Vol. 28, no 1, 147-158 p.
Keyword [en]
Urban/rural differences, Long-term care, Older people, Public care, Eldercare, Target efficiency
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-11777DOI: 10.1007/s40520-015-0369-5ISI: 000371249700016PubMedID: 25990665OAI: diva2:916326
Available from: 2016-04-01 Created: 2016-04-01 Last updated: 2016-04-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fagerstrom, CeciliaSanmartin Berglund, Johan
By organisation
Department of Health
In the same journal
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 82 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link