Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Samverkan mellan kommuner - hur påverkar det medborgardeltagandet?: Fallstudier av tre kommuner i Dalarna.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Spatial Planning.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Spatial Planning.
2016 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Denna studie handlar om hur kommuner med olika förutsättningar arbetar med medborgardeltagande. Studien grundas på antagandet att en mindre kommun med svaga resurser kan få svårigheter i arbetet med medborgardeltagande. Detta antagande utreds i en jämförelse mellan en kommun som arbetar med ett enskilt plankontor och två kommuner av liknande storlek som samarbetar med en gemensam stadsbyggnadsförvaltning. Forskningen har fokuserat på hur planarkitekterna själva upplever att arbetet med medborgardeltagandet har fungerat i deras kommun. För att komplettera planerarnas åsikter behandlas också kommunala dokument i studien. Arbetet är en del av kandidatprogrammet Fysisk Planering och handlar om medborgardeltagande som är en viktig del av den fysiska planeringen. I uppsatsen går det att läsa om de kommuner som har valts ut, deras bakgrund, hur de arbetar med medborgardialoger samt vilka skillnader som finns mellan de två fallen. Då det ena fallet innefattar två kommuner som samarbetar inom planeringsområdet finns det också i uppsatsen utredningar kring hur kommuner kan samverka, hur samarbetet ser ut i det här fallet samt hur en sådan samverkan kan påverka arbetet med medborgardeltagandet.

Abstract [en]

This study is about how municipalities with different qualifications are working with citizen participation. The study is based on the assumption that a small sized municipality with weak resources may have difficulties in the work of civic participation. This assumption is further investigated with a comparison between a municipality working with an individual planning office and two municipalities of similar size that collaborate with a mutual office for urban management. The research is focusing on how the planners themselves feel that the civic participation has worked in their municipality. Municipal documents are also used in this study next to the planners’ opinions to complete what might be missing. The study is part of the bachelor program Fysisk Planering (Spatial planning) and therefore the study includes civic participation which is a very important part of spatial planning. In the paper you can read about the municipalities that have been selected, their background, how they work with civic participation and what differences there are between the cases. Because of the fact that one of the cases includes two municipalities that cooperate in the planning field there is also a focus in the study on how this cooperation could look like, how it works in this case and at last how a cooperation like this can affect the work of the citizen participation in the municipalities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 78 p.
Keyword [en]
Citizen Participation, Spatial Planning, Municipal Cooperation, Civil Dialogue
Keyword [sv]
Medborgardeltagande, Fysisk Planering, Kommunal Samverkan, Medborgardialog
National Category
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-12021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-12021DiVA: diva2:935282
Subject / course
FM1473 Bachelor's Thesis in Spatial Planning
Educational program
FMGFP Spatial Planning
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-06-13 Created: 2016-06-10 Last updated: 2016-06-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

BTH2016Håmås(832 kB)60 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 832 kBChecksum SHA-512
1788f86e37d8f5a7e5626aecdb6f9a68c14699d8f7b23fd9f71f1243ec9caf12769ea154895fa72508049b5a1e068952915943ea2154b46683999fc4861168d4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Spatial Planning
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 60 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 213 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf