Introduction
A comprehensive plan (ÖP) is a municipal policy in Sweden that guides political ambitions for the use of spatial resources. As the built environment impacts the health and well-being of older people (WHO, 2016) and the aging issue is considered a welfare challenge, this study analyzes how the aging issue is treated in ÖP of Älvkarleby municipality.
Theoretical framework and methods
Foucauldian (1993:8) and Laclau and Mouffes (2001) discourse theoretical concepts such as “foreclosing procedures” and chain of equivalence and differences are used in the study to understand the dialectical relation between discourse, knowledge, and power that reinforces ideological domination. Spatial justice (Soja, 2010) is used to assess ÖP’s compliance with older people’s identity and agency. The themes and patterns of planning language are identified through the close reading of Älvkarleby’s ÖP. Results are analyzed using Fairclough’s (1995) critical discourse analysis (CDA) i.e. analysis of text, context, and structure.
Results and Analysis
Context:
· Älvkarleby has 9625 people with 24.7% above 65 years old and is facing growth stagnation and outflow of young and working-age people.
· Older people and other vulnerable groups’ contribution to growth ambition is silent in ÖP.
· The exploitation of strengths such as “housing, tourism, and business…”(p14) and the influx of youth, working-age population, and companies are considered conditions of possibility for growth and welfare.
· Growth-oriented planning discourse thus characterizes the ÖP which fits in Älvkarleby´s context.
Text:
· ÖP’s desire is to achieve “economically and ecologically robust structures” (ÖP, 2020:7- 86)
· Truth claim is that the growth stagnation and welfare challenge are associated with “unbalanced demography with many older people” signified as “negative effects” (ibid, 2020:14)
· Chain of equivalence: Welfare challenges are associated with eldercare, social services, low taxes, and disability. Growth ambition is associated with youth, natural resources, cultural history, knowledge society, productive population, and tourism (ÖP, 2020:14).
· Dichotomy between the influx of children, youths, working-age population, tourists, and companies as facilitators for future prosperity; and older people, among others, as receivers of welfare provisions.
Structure
· A robust social structure is claimed to be achievable through the contributions of young and working-age populations which unconsciously induces “foreclosing” of older people’s identity and agency in the growth-oriented discourse.
· Planning knowledge having the power to legitimize place-marketing through the commodification of spatial resources as a condition of possibility to fund welfare regime is reinforced and maintained in ÖP.
· ÖP contains thus traces of political and socio-economic restructuration plans to create a society that indicates a new capitalist planning ideology.
· Such discourse may have a pervasive impact on the social relations of older people.
Discussion
Space for older people’s active agency is overlooked in the ÖP through foreclosing procedures. The spatial justice concerns ‘equitable participation’ and is conditioned by resource redistribution, respect, and democracy. (Fraser, 2011:103–4; Soja, 2009). The ÖP is silent about the older people’s participation in the production of space and economic growth. The dichotomy of population into productive and desired and dependent and undesired puts the planning ambition of a cohesive society at stake.
Conclusion
The silence about older people’s agency and the signification of “care” in an affluent municipality puts spatial justice – diversity, democracy, and equality – at stake. Beyond the conventional view of eldercare, municipalities need to endeavor to recognize older people’s spatial justice.