The incidence and variety of diseases associated with ticks have increased world-wide and ticks are currently considered to be second only to mosquitoes as vectors of human infectious diseases in the world. In the northern hemisphere, Ixodes ricinus, the most common tick, transmits diseases caused by several infectious pathogens, including different types of bacteria, virus and protozoa. In Sweden, Lyme borreliosis, tick-borne encephalitis and erlichiosis are established, and more than 10.000 people are infected each year. This thesis focuses on aspects of risks associated with tick bites, the risk of contracting tick borne diseases including long-term outcome, and preventive measures and behaviour among people living in tick endemic areas. The first study describes the long-term outcome in patients treated with antibiotics due to neuroborreliosis. At the follow up, 75% of the patients had recovered completely and 25% (95% confidence interval; 17% - 33%) suffered from residual neurological symptoms such as facial palsy, concentration disorder, paresthesia and/or neuropathy. In order to avoid sequelae, early diagnosis and treatment are of great importance. The second study investigated the exposure and contraction of tick-bites with the risk of developing Lyme borreliosis from these tick-bites. Results showed that among people well aware of tick-borne diseases and who inspect their skin daily for ticks, the monthly rate of being tick bitten was 0.04 (95% confidence interval; 0.02-0.06) per 10 hours spent out of doors. Within six months, 3% had contracted Lyme borreliosis, i.e. the risk of developing this disease was 0.5% (95% confidence interval; 0.44-0.56) per tick-bite. The third (experimental) study was aimed at determining whether light-coloured or dark-coloured clothing had the least attractive effect on Ixodes ricinus. The overall found ticks between the both colours differed significantly, with 62% (95% confidence interval; 59% - 65%) of the ticks found on light-coloured clothing. Dark-coloured clothing seems to attract fewer ticks. The fourth study describes tick preventive measures, and their predictors, taken among highly exposed people. In total, 69% of the participants regularly took preventive measures, personally and/or in the environment. When analysing gender and preventive measure solely, women took more preventive measures compared to men. When analysing all risk variables together, spending less time in tick endemic area and being tick bitten the same tick season significantly increased the probability of taking any preventive measures. After being tick bitten, men increased their performance of preventive measures more than women.