Cross‐project defect prediction (CPDP), where data from different software projects are used to predict defects, has been proposed as a way to provide data for software projects that lack historical data. Evaluations of CPDP models using the Nearest Neighbour (NN)Filter approach have shown promising results in recent studies. A key challenge with defect‐prediction datasets is class imbalance, that is, highly skewed datasets where nonbuggy modules dominate the buggy modules. In the past, data resampling approaches have been applied to within‐projects defect prediction models to help alleviate the negative effects of class imbalance in the datasets. To address the class imbalance issue in CPDP, the authors assess the impact of data resampling approaches on CPDP models after the NN Filter is applied. The impact on prediction performance of five oversampling approaches (MAHAKIL, SMOTE, Borderline‐SMOTE, Random Oversamplingand ADASYN) and three undersampling approaches (Random Undersampling, Tomek Links and One‐sided selection) is investigated and results are compared to approaches without data resampling. The authors examined six defect prediction models on34 datasets extracted from the PROMISE repository. The authors' results show that there is a significant positive effect of data resampling on CPDP performance, suggesting that software quality teams and researchers should consider applying data resampling approaches for improved recall (pd) and g‐measure prediction performance. However, if the goal is to improve precision and reduce false alarm (pf) then data resampling approaches should be avoided.