1415161718192017 of 70
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Generative AI in Assessment and Feedback Generation in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Computer Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6264-5010
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0009-0004-5806-6624
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0868-7831
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8267-8370
2025 (English)In: Proceedings of the 2025 17th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, ICETC 2025, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2025, p. 361-371Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Assessment and feedback activities in higher education are undergoing significant changes. Many universities and institutes still rely on traditional testing and grading methods, which often fall short in supporting meaningful student learning, especially in large classes. Although educational policies, such as those promoted by the Bologna process, encourage more feedback-oriented and student-centered approaches, these practices can be difficult to implement due to time constraints and limited resources. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), has shown strong potential in addressing these challenges. This review examines 21 research studies published between 2023 and 2025 that explore the use of GenAI in providing feedback and assessing student work in higher education, with some studies also comparing GenAI's performance with human instructors. Findings show that LLMs can generate personalized and constructive feedback and/or assist with fair and consistent assessment. However, in most studies, teachers still play a key role, as expert oversight is essential to ensure that grading assessments and assignment feedback are accurate, relevant, and aligned with learning objectives. For GenAI to be used effectively, educators need to understand how to work with these tools, such as learning GenAI prompt design and the basic principles behind LLMs. We recommend that academic institutions provide training for educators in AI literacy, prompt engineering, and the development of teaching strategies that combine the strengths of human judgment with AI support. By effectively integrating LLM tools, major assessment challenges, such as limited time and inconsistent feedback quality, can be addressed while also enhancing student learning and engagement. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2025. p. 361-371
Keywords [en]
Automatic Feedback, Automatic Scoring, Comprehensive Study, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), Large Language Model (LLMs), Artificial intelligence, Education computing, Engineering education, Engineering research, Feedback, Learning systems, Personnel training, Students, Teaching, Generative artificial intelligence, Grading methods, High educations, Language model, Large language model, Systematic Review, Testing method, Grading
National Category
Educational Work Artificial Intelligence
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-29449DOI: 10.1109/ICETC66579.2025.11387416Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105035156727ISBN: 9798331597917 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-29449DiVA, id: diva2:2055860
Conference
2025 17th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, ICETC 2025, Barcelona, Sept 18-21, 2025
Available from: 2026-04-27 Created: 2026-04-27 Last updated: 2026-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(246 kB)15 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 246 kBChecksum SHA-512
52364a77a4309b25169c873fa7db587b5efdf1212e7bf7f51d3bfecb2cff714768c6d24bbd3aa490de36eed23859bfff31939c268e20ec290771d921b3d1180b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Yavariabdi, AmirPaudel, BhuwanCarleton, TamaraAndrade de Almeida, Carlos Diego

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yavariabdi, AmirPaudel, BhuwanCarleton, TamaraAndrade de Almeida, Carlos Diego
By organisation
Department of Computer ScienceDepartment of Software EngineeringDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
Educational WorkArtificial Intelligence

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 141 hits
1415161718192017 of 70
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf